[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Qemu-devel] [RFC] Plan for moving forward with QOM
From: |
Anthony Liguori |
Subject: |
[Qemu-devel] [RFC] Plan for moving forward with QOM |
Date: |
Wed, 14 Sep 2011 13:04:00 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110516 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.10 |
Hi,
I spent a couple hours today writing up some comparisons and an initial
task list for converting qdev to QOM. The main location of this is the
wiki[1] but I thought I would inline it here for easier commenting.
I decided to do this because I wanted to avoid a massively long 00 patch
explaining the rationale for the first batch of changes that I'm going
to send out.
There is so much complexity in qdev and the device model in general that
it's hard to come up with a concise document. I'd really appreciate
suggestions for topics to write up more rationale as that would help me
avoid writing a book on the topic :-)
[1] http://wiki.qemu.org/Features/QOM
== Device Relationships ==
=== Device Relationships in QDev ===
The two main concepts in QDev are devices and busses. A device is
represented
by a DeviceState and a bus is represented by a BusState. They do not
share a
common base class. Devices can have properties but busses cannot. A device
has no direct relationship with other devices. The only relationship is
indirect through busses.
A device may have zero or more busses associated with it via a has-a
relationship. Each child bus may have multiple devices associated with
it via
a reference. All devices have a single parent bus and all busses have a
single
parent device. These relationships form a strict tree where every
alternating
level is a bus level followed by a device level. The root of the tree
is the
main system bus often referred to as SysBus.
=== Device Relationships in QOM ===
Everything in QOM is a device. The concept of busses are implemented as an
interface that a device implements. Devices can have two types of
relationships
with other devices: device composition or device backlinks. Device
composition
involves one device directly creating another device. It will own life
cycle
management for the created device and will generally propagate events to
that
device (although there are exceptions).
Device backlinks allow one device to refer to another device in a looser
fashion. While there can be only one device composition relationship that
exists between two specific devices, a device can participate in an
arbitrary
number of backlinks.
Device composition and backlinks are both strongly typed and can be
typed as a
specific device type or as an interface. When typed as an interface, any
device that implements that interface can be used.
There is no explicit notion of parents in QOM. A typical bus relationship
would the bus having a backlink to the child device, and the child
device having
a backlink to the bus.
Without device backlinks, device composition forms a multi-rooted strict
tree.
With backlinks, the result are multiple directed graphs.
== Naming ==
=== Naming in QDev ===
QDev has three namespaces: the device namespace, the bus namespace, and
property
namespaces.
The device namespace contains the names of qdev devices. qdev supports the
ability to have anonymous devices. Anonymous devices are usually created
through composition and are anonymous because the user controls the device
namespace and the user has no way of allocating names for devices created
through composition.
The bus namespace is parallel to the device namespace. Unlike the device
namespace, busses cannot be anonymous. For busses that are created as a
result
of composition, a name is derived either from the device name or via the
type
name.
In qdev, implicit bus names are not considered stable and may change across
invocations and/or versions of QEMU.
Property namespaces are local to devices. The 'id' property is reserved to
refer to the name of the device. Property names do not reference child
devices.
Paths cannot be meaningfully constructed in QDev. Devices can only be
addressed
directly by their name as there is no stable way to refer to busses under a
device, or children under a bus.
=== Naming in QOM ===
In QOM, there are only two namespaces, the device namespace and the property
namespace.
All devices have unique names. There are no exceptions. Devices created
through composition are given unique names by deriving the name based on the
parent device name and a special separator, "::", that cannot be used in
user
supplied names.
Since a bus is-a device in QOM, there is no notion of having multiple busses
under the same device. A device can implement multiple bus interfaces,
but can
only be a single bus of any given bus interface.
Device names are completely independent of pathnames. For devices that
are no
user created, device names should be treated as opaque blobs with
absolutely no
semantic meaning.
All device relationships are identified as named properties. A QOM path
name
consists of a named device, followed by a series of properties which may
or may
not refer to other devices. For instance, all of the following are
valid paths:
/i440fx/piix3/i8042/aux
/i440fx/slot[1.0]/i8042/aux
/i440fx/slot[1.0]/bus/piix3/i8042/aux
All of these path names are interpreted as follows:
def resolve_pathname(pathname):
root, props = pathname[1:].split('/')
dev = find_device(root)
for prop in props:
device_name = get_property(dev, prop)
dev = find_device(device_name)
return dev
In this specific example, the i440fx object has two properties that both
refer
to the PIIX3 device. The 'piix3' device is a property that reflects a
device
composition relationship. The 'slot[1.0]' property represents a device
backlink
relationship.
The PIIX3 device has a 'i8042' property based on device composition of
the PC
Keyboard Controller device. It also has a device backlink property,
'bus', that
points to the bus that it sits on (which is the 'i440fx' object).
Finally, the PC Keyboard Controller device has an 'aux' property which is a
device backlink property that can point to a PS/2 Mouse device.
The full set of devices names and properties used in this example are below:
Type: I440FX
Is-a: Device
Implements: PciBus
Name: i440fx
Properties:
piix3: Composition<PIIX3>
slot[1.0]: Backlink<PciDevice>
Type: PIIX3
Isa-a: PciDevice
Implements: IsaBus
Name: i440fx::piix3
Properties:
i8042: Composition<I8042>
bus: Backlink<PciDevice> (inherited from PciDevice)
Type: I8042
Isa-a: Device
Implements: Ps2Controller
Name: i440fx::piix3::i8042
Properties:
aux: Backlink<Ps2Mouse>
== Device Properties ==
=== Properties in QDev ===
Device properties in qdev are bound to classes and map directly to
elements of
the device structure. They are strongly typed. Each type is parsed
directly
from a string representation. There is no way to set qdev properties from
anything but a string.
Device properties in qdev are only settable during construction. After
construction, they are read-only. Devices cannot hook setting or
getting of a
property.
=== Properties in QOM ===
Device properties in QOM are bound to devices and are implemented by
closures
provided by the device. A Visitor is passed to the closure which
effectively
allows properties to be set/get through native C types. Mapping to any
other
type of representation (string or otherwise) is done by a Visitor with no
knowledge of the device or property.
By convention, most device properties are implemented by writing a C typed
public getter/setter for the device, and then using a property wrapper to
translate those typed functions to an untyped closure that accepts a
Visitor.
QOM has no notion of construction. All devices are created without
properties.
Properties can be set/get after initialization. Devices support the notion
of "realize" which roughly corresponds to construction. More accurately, it
corresponds to the moment before a device will be first consumed by a guest.
"unrealize" roughly corresponds to reset. A device may be realized and
unrealized many times during its lifecycle.
Properties are, by default, locked while the device is realized.
Exceptions can
be made by the devices themselves in order to implement a way for a user to
interact with a device while it is realized.
Two special types of properties are plug<> and socket<> properties. A
plug<>
property is used to represent device composition. When a plug<> property is
added, the child device has its life cycle automatically tied to the parent
device. The socket<> property represents a device backlink.
The plug<> property type is always read-only and when read, will return the
name of the child device.
The socket<> property type is by default read/write and locked during
realize.
Hotplug can be implemented by allowing a socket to be writable after
realize and
installing a custom setter function that implements hotplug behavior.
== TODO ==
1. Eliminate anonymous devices.
a. Will require touching any place in the tree that creates a qdev
object and
giving a meaningful unique name.
2. Refactor any device that creates 2 or more busses to only create a
single
bus. This will mean using composition.
a. An example: IDE controller creates two busses, one for the primary
and one
for the secondary. Instead, IDE device should have two IDE
controller sub
devices, each device having a single bus.
3. Unify the bus/device namespaces
a. This is a compatibility breaker
b. Depends on (1) and (2)
4. Modify qdev properties to allow devices to register setters/getters
that use
visitors to access properties.
a. Implement existing properties in terms of visitors
5. Modify qdev properties to be stored in the object, not in the class
6. Expose children as named properties
a. Read only to start with
7. Change qdev to use QOM typing
a. Depends on (3)
b. Must change all init functions to use QOM init functions
c. Change all DO_UPCASTS to QOM macro casts
d. Can be largely done via sed
8. Change children to be based on plug and socket properties
a. Eliminate children list in each device
b. Compatibility breaker
9. Improve object model
a. Compatibility breaker
- [Qemu-devel] [RFC] Plan for moving forward with QOM,
Anthony Liguori <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] Plan for moving forward with QOM, Anthony Liguori, 2011/09/14
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] Plan for moving forward with QOM, Jan Kiszka, 2011/09/14
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] Plan for moving forward with QOM, Anthony Liguori, 2011/09/14
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] Plan for moving forward with QOM, Jan Kiszka, 2011/09/14
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] Plan for moving forward with QOM, Anthony Liguori, 2011/09/14
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] Plan for moving forward with QOM, Jan Kiszka, 2011/09/15
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] Plan for moving forward with QOM, Anthony Liguori, 2011/09/15
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] Plan for moving forward with QOM, Jan Kiszka, 2011/09/15
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] Plan for moving forward with QOM, Anthony Liguori, 2011/09/15
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] Plan for moving forward with QOM, Kevin Wolf, 2011/09/16