[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] How to lock-up your tap-based VM network
From: |
Paul Brook |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] How to lock-up your tap-based VM network |
Date: |
Tue, 13 Apr 2010 00:20:13 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.12.4 (Linux/2.6.33-2-amd64; KDE/4.3.4; x86_64; ; ) |
> But anyway, this flow control mechanism is buggy - what if instead of
> an interface down, you just have a *slow* guest? That should not push
> back so much that it makes other guests networking with each other
> slow down.
The OP described multiple guests connected via a host bridge. In this case it
is entirely the host's responsibility to arbitrate between multiple guests. If
one interface can block the bridge simply by failing to respond in a timely
manner then this is a serious bug or misconfiguration of your host bridge.
The reason tap_send exists is because slirp does not implement TCP flow
control properly. Instead it relies on the can_send hook to only avoid
dropped packets.
Using this in the tap code is debatable. My guess is that this is a hack to
workaround guest network stacks that expect throughput to be limited by line
speed (which is a virtual environment is effectively infinite), have poor
higher level flow control, and react badly to packet loss.
Paul