|
From: | Shin-ichiro KAWASAKI |
Subject: | Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] SH7750/51: add register BCR3, NCR4, PCR, RTCOR, RTCNT, RTCSR, SDMR2, SDMR3 and fix BCR2 support |
Date: | Mon, 15 Dec 2008 00:36:21 +0900 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (Windows/20081105) |
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
-+static int inline is_sh7751r_cpu(SH7750State * s) +{ + return (s->cpu->id & (SH_CPU_SH7751R)); +} /********************************************************************** I/O ports **********************************************************************/ @@ -212,8 +219,17 @@ static uint32_t sh7750_mem_readw(void *opaque, target_phys_addr_t addr) switch (addr) { case SH7750_BCR2_A7: return s->bcr2; + case SH7750_BCR3_A7: + if(is_sh7751r_cpu(s)) { + return s->bcr3; + } else { + error_access("word read", addr); + assert(0); + }BCR3 exists not only for SH7751R, but also SH7750. I think is_shh751r_cpu() check and error handling should be removed to simplify the differcence.as write in the SH7751r datasheet Bus Control Register 3 (BCR3) (SH7751R Only) Bus Control Register 4 (BCR4) (SH7751R Only) That's why I've add the check
I see. Your code is right, but let me add one more comment. - SH7750 and SH7751 ... does not have BCR3 nor BCR4 - SH7750R and SH7751R ... have BCR3 and BCR4 So, to make it better, how about renaming "is_h7751r_cpu()" into "has_bcr3_and_bcr4()"? It will be like this. static int inline has_bcr3_and_bcr4(SH7750State * s) { return (s->cpu->id & (SH_CPU_SH7750R | SH_CPU_SH7751R)); }
Compared to 'if' statement, 'switch-case' might be more easy to understand, like as follows. case SH7750_SDMR2 ... SH7750_SDMR2 + SDMR2_REGNBok elvenif it's a gcc ony extension
Ah, gccism policy seems not clear in QEMU project. This extension is used in many hw/*.c, so I guessed it as a QEMU's usual implementation style. I hope comments on it from main developers. Regards, Shin-ichiro KAWASAKI
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |