[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch] s390-dis.c license
From: |
Johannes Schindelin |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch] s390-dis.c license |
Date: |
Thu, 17 Jan 2008 18:55:39 +0000 (GMT) |
User-agent: |
Alpine 1.00 (LSU 882 2007-12-20) |
Hi,
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008, Stefan Weil wrote:
> Is GPLv3 unwanted for QEMU source code? If yes: why?
The problem is: you would have to ask every contributor whose code is
still somewhere in the source code. That is tedious, and takes time (I do
not even think that an email would suffice).
Besides, it would probably give problems to other projects using GPLv2 and
using parts of QEmu (Xen, Darwine, ...).
Speaking for myself, I'm not that interested in licenses, but code...
Ciao,
Dscho
- [Qemu-devel] [patch] s390-dis.c license, Ulrich Hecht, 2008/01/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch] s390-dis.c license, Stefan Weil, 2008/01/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch] s390-dis.c license, M. Warner Losh, 2008/01/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch] s390-dis.c license,
Johannes Schindelin <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch] s390-dis.c license, Ricardo Almeida, 2008/01/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch] s390-dis.c license, M. Warner Losh, 2008/01/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch] s390-dis.c license, Bill C. Riemers, 2008/01/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch] s390-dis.c license, andrzej zaborowski, 2008/01/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch] s390-dis.c license, Thiemo Seufer, 2008/01/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch] s390-dis.c license, M. Warner Losh, 2008/01/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch] s390-dis.c license, Johannes Schindelin, 2008/01/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch] s390-dis.c license, M. Warner Losh, 2008/01/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch] s390-dis.c license, Thiemo Seufer, 2008/01/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch] s390-dis.c license, andrzej zaborowski, 2008/01/17