|
From: | Leonardo Marques de Souza |
Subject: | Re: [Qemu-devel] (TEST) CFLAGS options + qemu 0.60 |
Date: | Fri, 30 Jul 2004 16:13:57 -0300 |
User-agent: | Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.1 (X11/20040715) |
Works great! so im doing some benchmarks to see any general diference. i trying PCMark 2002, any other sugestion? I think the benchmark programs is a good choice to test virtual CPU, becouse they use a lot of optimized intructions.Well, when i use -mregpar=x, que qemu made a lot of 'booboos'. Some time start,
others guest Win98 and Linux crash... not recomended for "production" hehe :P Leonardo Marques de Souza wrote:
Thanks! Im looking for I'll try to workarround compilation problem, doing it by hand, it happens only with help.c (well, all help.c in qemu tree) enter in i386 , i386-softemu , ppc-softemu and doing:gcc -Wall -O2 -march=pentium -fno-strict-aliasing -fomit-frame-pointer -I. -I/root/qemu-0.6.0/target-i386 -I/root/qemu-0.6.0 -D_GNU_SOURCE -I/root/qemu-0.6.0/slirp -c -o helper.o /root/qemu-0.6.0/target-i386/helper.cjust return to root tree compilation and do make again to continue. I will see what instable qemu will be with -regparm=[1..3]. :)
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |