qemu-block
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] include/sysemu/blockdev.h: move drive_add and inline


From: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] include/sysemu/blockdev.h: move drive_add and inline drive_def
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2021 11:34:16 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.2.0



On 15/12/2021 11:00, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 15.12.2021 um 10:19 hat Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito geschrieben:


On 14/12/2021 15:35, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 30.11.2021 um 10:46 hat Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito geschrieben:
drive_add is only used in softmmu/vl.c, so it can be a static
function there, and drive_def is only a particular use case of
qemu_opts_parse_noisily, so it can be inlined.

Also remove drive_mark_claimed_by_board, as it is only defined
but not implemented (nor used) anywhere.

Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>

I don't think moving drive_add() actually improves anything. Yes, you
can make it static, but in order to do that you had to introduce
block_if_name() as a new public function and you're moving an obviously
block related function to common code in vl.c.

So this part doesn't look like a net win to me. The rest of the series
looks good to me.


So are we going to drop patch 2 and 3? For me it is fine either way, and I
saw Stefan added r-b to all patches.

If we are, Kevin are you going to apply only patch 1 and 4, or do you want
me to send v3?

This patch does a bit more than just moving drive_add(). It also inlines
drive_def() and deletes drive_mark_claimed_by_board(), which are both
things that make sense to me. So this suggests a v3.

But if you think I should just apply patches 1 and 4, I'm happy to do
that, too.

You're right, I forgot about that. I will send v3, thanks.

Emanuele




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]