Am 18.05.2020 um 18:12 hat Thomas Huth geschrieben:
On 15/05/2020 23.15, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
Rename bitmaps migration tests and move them to tests subdirectory to
demonstrate new human-friendly test naming.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <address@hidden>
---
tests/qemu-iotests/{199 => tests/migrate-bitmaps-postcopy-test} | 0
.../{199.out => tests/migrate-bitmaps-postcopy-test.out} | 0
tests/qemu-iotests/{169 => tests/migrate-bitmaps-test} | 0
tests/qemu-iotests/{169.out => tests/migrate-bitmaps-test.out} | 0
4 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
rename tests/qemu-iotests/{199 => tests/migrate-bitmaps-postcopy-test} (100%)
rename tests/qemu-iotests/{199.out =>
tests/migrate-bitmaps-postcopy-test.out} (100%)
rename tests/qemu-iotests/{169 => tests/migrate-bitmaps-test} (100%)
rename tests/qemu-iotests/{169.out => tests/migrate-bitmaps-test.out} (100%)
diff --git a/tests/qemu-iotests/199
b/tests/qemu-iotests/tests/migrate-bitmaps-postcopy-test
similarity index 100%
rename from tests/qemu-iotests/199
rename to tests/qemu-iotests/tests/migrate-bitmaps-postcopy-test
diff --git a/tests/qemu-iotests/199.out
b/tests/qemu-iotests/tests/migrate-bitmaps-postcopy-test.out
similarity index 100%
rename from tests/qemu-iotests/199.out
rename to tests/qemu-iotests/tests/migrate-bitmaps-postcopy-test.out
diff --git a/tests/qemu-iotests/169
b/tests/qemu-iotests/tests/migrate-bitmaps-test
similarity index 100%
rename from tests/qemu-iotests/169
rename to tests/qemu-iotests/tests/migrate-bitmaps-test
diff --git a/tests/qemu-iotests/169.out
b/tests/qemu-iotests/tests/migrate-bitmaps-test.out
similarity index 100%
rename from tests/qemu-iotests/169.out
rename to tests/qemu-iotests/tests/migrate-bitmaps-test.out
I like the idea ... but the path name + file names get now quite long.
While you're at it, what about renaming the "qemu-iotests" directory to
just "iotests" or even just "io" now?
Renames are always kind of painful. Do we have a real reason for the
rename except that the paths feel a bit long subjectively?
Of course, if we're renaming all files anyway, changing the directory
name at the same time shouldn't give any additional pain, so it would be
completely reasonable then. We're not renaming the test harness files,
though, and even only two test cases in this patch.
Maybe this final patch should stay RFC until we have the infrastructure
in and then we can have a single series that moves all tests and also
renames the directory? Maybe a not strictly necessary rename of the
tooling would be bearable in the context of a mass rename of tests.