[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Priority of -accel
From: |
Christophe de Dinechin |
Subject: |
Re: Priority of -accel |
Date: |
Mon, 13 Jan 2020 17:14:49 +0100 |
> On 13 Jan 2020, at 15:39, Markus Armbruster <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Thomas Huth <address@hidden> writes:
>>>>
>>>> 'any' is a russian roulette, you don't want it to return 'qtest' ;)
>>>
>>> We could make it return "qtest" only on April 1st ;-P
>>
>> ... or we finally dare to let QEMU chose the "best" accelerator by
>> default if no "-accel" option has been specified...
>
> Changing a default that has ceased to make sense a decade ago? Are you
> out of your mind?
>
> ;-P
Well, it makes perfect sense, since we select kvm first on macOS and, I guess,
all non-Linux platforms ;-)
% ./x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64
qemu-system-x86_64: invalid accelerator kvm
qemu-system-x86_64: falling back to tcg
(Fixing that knowing that CONFIG_KVM is poisoned in vl.c is left as an
exercise for the reader)
Christophe
- Priority of -accel (was: [PATCH] tests/qemu-iotests: Update tests to recent desugarized -accel option), (continued)
- Priority of -accel (was: [PATCH] tests/qemu-iotests: Update tests to recent desugarized -accel option), Thomas Huth, 2020/01/07
- Re: Priority of -accel (was: [PATCH] tests/qemu-iotests: Update tests to recent desugarized -accel option), Paolo Bonzini, 2020/01/07
- Re: Priority of -accel (was: [PATCH] tests/qemu-iotests: Update tests to recent desugarized -accel option), Thomas Huth, 2020/01/07
- Re: Priority of -accel (was: [PATCH] tests/qemu-iotests: Update tests to recent desugarized -accel option), Paolo Bonzini, 2020/01/07
- Re: Priority of -accel (was: [PATCH] tests/qemu-iotests: Update tests to recent desugarized -accel option), Daniel P . Berrangé, 2020/01/07
- Re: Priority of -accel (was: [PATCH] tests/qemu-iotests: Update tests to recent desugarized -accel option), Thomas Huth, 2020/01/07
- Re: Priority of -accel, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2020/01/07
- Re: Priority of -accel, Daniel P . Berrangé, 2020/01/07
- Re: Priority of -accel, Thomas Huth, 2020/01/07
- Re: Priority of -accel, Markus Armbruster, 2020/01/13
- Re: Priority of -accel,
Christophe de Dinechin <=
- Re: Priority of -accel, Paolo Bonzini, 2020/01/13
- Re: Priority of -accel (was: [PATCH] tests/qemu-iotests: Update tests to recent desugarized -accel option), Daniel P . Berrangé, 2020/01/07
- Re: Priority of -accel (was: [PATCH] tests/qemu-iotests: Update tests to recent desugarized -accel option), Alex Bennée, 2020/01/08
- Re: Priority of -accel (was: [PATCH] tests/qemu-iotests: Update tests to recent desugarized -accel option), Thomas Huth, 2020/01/08
- Re: Priority of -accel (was: [PATCH] tests/qemu-iotests: Update tests to recent desugarized -accel option), Paolo Bonzini, 2020/01/08
- Re: Priority of -accel (was: [PATCH] tests/qemu-iotests: Update tests to recent desugarized -accel option), Daniel P . Berrangé, 2020/01/08
- Re: Priority of -accel (was: [PATCH] tests/qemu-iotests: Update tests to recent desugarized -accel option), Paolo Bonzini, 2020/01/08
- Re: Priority of -accel, Thomas Huth, 2020/01/08
- Re: Priority of -accel (was: [PATCH] tests/qemu-iotests: Update tests to recent desugarized -accel option), Peter Maydell, 2020/01/08
- Re: Priority of -accel (was: [PATCH] tests/qemu-iotests: Update tests to recent desugarized -accel option), Peter Maydell, 2020/01/10