qemu-arm
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 0/2] target/arm: Always build Aarch64 gdbstub helpers


From: Peter Maydell
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] target/arm: Always build Aarch64 gdbstub helpers
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2024 16:01:03 +0100

On Fri, 28 Jun 2024 at 17:50, Richard Henderson
<richard.henderson@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On 6/28/24 09:37, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> > On 28/6/24 16:31, Richard Henderson wrote:
> >> On 6/19/24 05:49, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> >>> Merge gdbstub64.c in gdbstub.c and remove uses of
> >>> target specific TARGET_AARCH64 definition.
> >>> Small step toward single ARM/Aarch64 binary.
> >>>
> >>> Philippe Mathieu-Daudé (2):
> >>>    target/arm: Merge gdbstub64.c within gdbstub.c
> >>>    target/arm: Always build Aarch64 gdbstub helpers
> >>>
> >>>   target/arm/cpu.h       |   8 +-
> >>>   target/arm/internals.h |   2 -
> >>>   target/arm/gdbstub.c   | 363 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >>>   target/arm/gdbstub64.c | 383 -----------------------------------------
> >>>   target/arm/meson.build |   1 -
> >>>   5 files changed, 364 insertions(+), 393 deletions(-)
> >>>   delete mode 100644 target/arm/gdbstub64.c
> >>>
> >>
> >> Are we attempting a single binary for user-only as well?
> >
> > No, due to ABI constraints, right? I did a user-emulation
> > smoke build, no failure, did I miss something?
>
> Well, no.  But qemu-arm does not need gdbstub64.c.
> Given TARGET_AARCH64 will be set on a combined build, I'm not sure what is 
> the fix?

Richard: I'm a bit confused about where we are with this
patchset. Do your comments mean:
 * this patchset is OK for system emulation but we
   should (later) think also about user-mode ?
 * this patchset has a problem with user-mode so it
   needs rethinking ?
 * something else ?

thanks
-- PMM



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]