[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v2] hw/arm/smmuv3: add support for stage 1 access fault
From: |
Peter Maydell |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v2] hw/arm/smmuv3: add support for stage 1 access fault |
Date: |
Thu, 15 Feb 2024 13:44:27 +0000 |
On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 at 07:22, Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Luc,
> On 2/13/24 09:22, Luc Michel wrote:
> > An access fault is raised when the Access Flag is not set in the
> > looked-up PTE and the AFFD field is not set in the corresponding context
> > descriptor. This was already implemented for stage 2. Implement it for
> > stage 1 as well.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Luc Michel <luc.michel@amd.com>
> > ---
> >
> > v2: drop erroneous submodule modification
> >
> > ---
> >
> > hw/arm/smmuv3-internal.h | 1 +
> > include/hw/arm/smmu-common.h | 1 +
> > hw/arm/smmu-common.c | 10 ++++++++++
> > hw/arm/smmuv3.c | 1 +
> > 4 files changed, 13 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/hw/arm/smmuv3-internal.h b/hw/arm/smmuv3-internal.h
> > index e987bc4686b..e4dd11e1e62 100644
> > --- a/hw/arm/smmuv3-internal.h
> > +++ b/hw/arm/smmuv3-internal.h
> > @@ -622,10 +622,11 @@ static inline int pa_range(STE *ste)
> > #define CD_TSZ(x, sel) extract32((x)->word[0], (16 * (sel)) + 0, 6)
> > #define CD_TG(x, sel) extract32((x)->word[0], (16 * (sel)) + 6, 2)
> > #define CD_EPD(x, sel) extract32((x)->word[0], (16 * (sel)) + 14, 1)
> > #define CD_ENDI(x) extract32((x)->word[0], 15, 1)
> > #define CD_IPS(x) extract32((x)->word[1], 0 , 3)
> > +#define CD_AFFD(x) extract32((x)->word[1], 3 , 1)
> > #define CD_TBI(x) extract32((x)->word[1], 6 , 2)
> > #define CD_HD(x) extract32((x)->word[1], 10 , 1)
> > #define CD_HA(x) extract32((x)->word[1], 11 , 1)
> > #define CD_S(x) extract32((x)->word[1], 12, 1)
> > #define CD_R(x) extract32((x)->word[1], 13, 1)
> > diff --git a/include/hw/arm/smmu-common.h b/include/hw/arm/smmu-common.h
> > index fd8d772da11..5ec2e6c1a43 100644
> > --- a/include/hw/arm/smmu-common.h
> > +++ b/include/hw/arm/smmu-common.h
> > @@ -90,10 +90,11 @@ typedef struct SMMUTransCfg {
> > /* Shared fields between stage-1 and stage-2. */
> > int stage; /* translation stage */
> > bool disabled; /* smmu is disabled */
> > bool bypassed; /* translation is bypassed */
> > bool aborted; /* translation is aborted */
> > + bool affd; /* AF fault disable */
> > uint32_t iotlb_hits; /* counts IOTLB hits */
> > uint32_t iotlb_misses; /* counts IOTLB misses*/
> > /* Used by stage-1 only. */
> > bool aa64; /* arch64 or aarch32 translation table */
> > bool record_faults; /* record fault events */
> > diff --git a/hw/arm/smmu-common.c b/hw/arm/smmu-common.c
> > index 9a8ac45431a..09ff72e55f5 100644
> > --- a/hw/arm/smmu-common.c
> > +++ b/hw/arm/smmu-common.c
> > @@ -362,10 +362,20 @@ static int smmu_ptw_64_s1(SMMUTransCfg *cfg,
> > &block_size);
> > trace_smmu_ptw_block_pte(stage, level, baseaddr,
> > pte_addr, pte, iova, gpa,
> > block_size >> 20);
> > }
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * If AFFD and PTE.AF are 0 => fault. (5.4. Context Descriptor)
> > + * An Access fault takes priority over a Permission fault.
> nit: you may precise that this holds because HTTU is not currently supported
> > + */
I tweaked this comment text to read
+ * QEMU does not currently implement HTTU, so if AFFD and PTE.AF
+ * are 0 we take an Access flag fault. (5.4. Context Descriptor)
+ * An Access flag fault takes priority over a Permission fault.
and have applied the patch to target-arm.next, thanks.
-- PMM