[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A confusion about CXL in arm virt machine
From: |
Gregory Price |
Subject: |
Re: A confusion about CXL in arm virt machine |
Date: |
Fri, 16 Jun 2023 14:10:24 -0400 |
On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 03:43:31PM +0800, Yuquan Wang wrote:
> Hi, Gregory
>
> There is one confusion about CXL in QEMU I hope to consult.
> If you have some time to look at this email, I would have better
> understanding of CXL
> emulation in QEMU.
>
> On docs/system/devices/cxl.rst , Gregory wrote:
> A very simple setup with just one directly attached CXL Type 3 Volatile
> Memory device::
> qemu-system-aarch64 -M virt,gic-version=3,cxl=on -m 4g,maxmem=8G,slots=8 -cpu
> max \
> ......
>
> As the current master branch of QEMU has not yet complemented the CXL
> option/expansion
> in arm virt machine, how this example command lines worked? Or here used
> another branch
> rather than master?
>
> Many thanks
> Yuquan
As of today, the qemu/qemu.git master branch does have the required
patch for volatile region support: adacc814f541af9281c922e750d8ba4b90c1a73e
however, the last time i tested it on x86, the master branch was
incapable of enabling these regions with the latest kernel (6.3.x)
despite that kernel having sufficient support to do so. I have not dug
into what the discrepency between master and johnathan's working branch
are just yet.
Last I tested cxl-2023-05-25 branch of Johnathan's fork is working on x86:
https://gitlab.com/jic23/qemu/-/tree/cxl-2023-05-25
I have not worked with the ARM machine, but Johnathan may be able to
comment on the state of ARM support for this code.
~Gregory