[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 31/35] host/include/aarch64: Implement aes-round.h
From: |
Ard Biesheuvel |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 31/35] host/include/aarch64: Implement aes-round.h |
Date: |
Sat, 3 Jun 2023 14:50:52 +0200 |
On Sat, 3 Jun 2023 at 04:34, Richard Henderson
<richard.henderson@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> Detect AES in cpuinfo; implement the accel hooks.
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
> ---
> host/include/aarch64/host/aes-round.h | 204 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> host/include/aarch64/host/cpuinfo.h | 1 +
> util/cpuinfo-aarch64.c | 2 +
> 3 files changed, 207 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 host/include/aarch64/host/aes-round.h
>
> diff --git a/host/include/aarch64/host/aes-round.h
> b/host/include/aarch64/host/aes-round.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000..27ca823db6
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/host/include/aarch64/host/aes-round.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,204 @@
> +/*
> + * AArch64 specific aes acceleration.
> + * SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef HOST_AES_ROUND_H
> +#define HOST_AES_ROUND_H
> +
> +#include "host/cpuinfo.h"
> +#include <arm_neon.h>
> +
> +#ifdef __ARM_FEATURE_AES
> +# define HAVE_AES_ACCEL true
> +# define ATTR_AES_ACCEL
> +#else
> +# define HAVE_AES_ACCEL likely(cpuinfo & CPUINFO_AES)
> +# define ATTR_AES_ACCEL __attribute__((target("+crypto")))
> +#endif
> +
> +static inline uint8x16_t aes_accel_bswap(uint8x16_t x)
> +{
> + /* No arm_neon.h primitive, and the compilers don't share builtins. */
vqtbl1q_u8() perhaps?
> +#ifdef __clang__
> + return __builtin_shufflevector(x, x, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8,
> + 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, 0);
> +#else
> + return __builtin_shuffle(x, (uint8x16_t)
> + { 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8,
> + 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, 0, });
> +#endif
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Through clang 15, the aes inlines are only defined if __ARM_FEATURE_AES;
> + * one cannot use __attribute__((target)) to make them appear after the fact.
> + * Therefore we must fallback to inline asm.
> + */
> +#ifdef __ARM_FEATURE_AES
> +# define aes_accel_aesd vaesdq_u8
> +# define aes_accel_aese vaeseq_u8
> +# define aes_accel_aesmc vaesmcq_u8
> +# define aes_accel_aesimc vaesimcq_u8
> +#else
> +static inline uint8x16_t aes_accel_aesd(uint8x16_t d, uint8x16_t k)
> +{
> + asm(".arch_extension aes\n\t"
> + "aesd %0.16b, %1.16b" : "+w"(d) : "w"(k));
> + return d;
> +}
> +
> +static inline uint8x16_t aes_accel_aese(uint8x16_t d, uint8x16_t k)
> +{
> + asm(".arch_extension aes\n\t"
> + "aese %0.16b, %1.16b" : "+w"(d) : "w"(k));
> + return d;
> +}
> +
> +static inline uint8x16_t aes_accel_aesmc(uint8x16_t d)
> +{
> + asm(".arch_extension aes\n\t"
> + "aesmc %0.16b, %1.16b" : "=w"(d) : "w"(d));
Most ARM cores fuse aese/aesmc into a single uop (with the associated
performance boost) if the pattern is
aese x, y
aesmc x,x
aesd x, y
aesimc x,x
So it might make sense to use +w here at least, and use only a single
register (which the compiler will likely do in any case, but still)
I would assume that the compiler cannot issue these separately based
on the sequences below, but if it might, it may be worth it to emit
the aese/aesmc together in a single asm() block
> + return d;
> +}
> +
> +static inline uint8x16_t aes_accel_aesimc(uint8x16_t d)
> +{
> + asm(".arch_extension aes\n\t"
> + "aesimc %0.16b, %1.16b" : "=w"(d) : "w"(d));
> + return d;
> +}
> +#endif /* __ARM_FEATURE_AES */
> +
> +static inline void ATTR_AES_ACCEL
> +aesenc_MC_accel(AESState *ret, const AESState *st, bool be)
> +{
> + uint8x16_t t = (uint8x16_t)st->v;
> +
> + if (be) {
> + t = aes_accel_bswap(t);
> + t = aes_accel_aesmc(t);
> + t = aes_accel_bswap(t);
> + } else {
> + t = aes_accel_aesmc(t);
> + }
> + ret->v = (AESStateVec)t;
> +}
> +
> +static inline void ATTR_AES_ACCEL
> +aesenc_SB_SR_accel(AESState *ret, const AESState *st, bool be)
> +{
> + uint8x16_t t = (uint8x16_t)st->v;
> + uint8x16_t z = { };
> +
> + if (be) {
> + t = aes_accel_bswap(t);
> + t = aes_accel_aese(t, z);
> + t = aes_accel_bswap(t);
> + } else {
> + t = aes_accel_aese(t, z);
> + }
> + ret->v = (AESStateVec)t;
> +}
> +
> +static inline void ATTR_AES_ACCEL
> +aesenc_SB_SR_MC_AK_accel(AESState *ret, const AESState *st,
> + const AESState *rk, bool be)
> +{
> + uint8x16_t t = (uint8x16_t)st->v;
> + uint8x16_t k = (uint8x16_t)rk->v;
> + uint8x16_t z = { };
> +
> + if (be) {
> + t = aes_accel_bswap(t);
> + k = aes_accel_bswap(k);
> + t = aes_accel_aese(t, z);
> + t = aes_accel_aesmc(t);
> + t = veorq_u8(t, k);
> + t = aes_accel_bswap(t);
> + } else {
> + t = aes_accel_aese(t, z);
> + t = aes_accel_aesmc(t);
> + t = veorq_u8(t, k);
> + }
> + ret->v = (AESStateVec)t;
> +}
> +
> +static inline void ATTR_AES_ACCEL
> +aesdec_IMC_accel(AESState *ret, const AESState *st, bool be)
> +{
> + uint8x16_t t = (uint8x16_t)st->v;
> +
> + if (be) {
> + t = aes_accel_bswap(t);
> + t = aes_accel_aesimc(t);
> + t = aes_accel_bswap(t);
> + } else {
> + t = aes_accel_aesimc(t);
> + }
> + ret->v = (AESStateVec)t;
> +}
> +
> +static inline void ATTR_AES_ACCEL
> +aesdec_ISB_ISR_accel(AESState *ret, const AESState *st, bool be)
> +{
> + uint8x16_t t = (uint8x16_t)st->v;
> + uint8x16_t z = { };
> +
> + if (be) {
> + t = aes_accel_bswap(t);
> + t = aes_accel_aesd(t, z);
> + t = aes_accel_bswap(t);
> + } else {
> + t = aes_accel_aesd(t, z);
> + }
> + ret->v = (AESStateVec)t;
> +}
> +
> +static inline void ATTR_AES_ACCEL
> +aesdec_ISB_ISR_AK_IMC_accel(AESState *ret, const AESState *st,
> + const AESState *rk, bool be)
> +{
> + uint8x16_t t = (uint8x16_t)st->v;
> + uint8x16_t k = (uint8x16_t)rk->v;
> + uint8x16_t z = { };
> +
> + if (be) {
> + t = aes_accel_bswap(t);
> + k = aes_accel_bswap(k);
> + t = aes_accel_aesd(t, z);
> + t = veorq_u8(t, k);
> + t = aes_accel_aesimc(t);
> + t = aes_accel_bswap(t);
> + } else {
> + t = aes_accel_aesd(t, z);
> + t = veorq_u8(t, k);
> + t = aes_accel_aesimc(t);
> + }
> + ret->v = (AESStateVec)t;
> +}
> +
> +static inline void ATTR_AES_ACCEL
> +aesdec_ISB_ISR_IMC_AK_accel(AESState *ret, const AESState *st,
> + const AESState *rk, bool be)
> +{
> + uint8x16_t t = (uint8x16_t)st->v;
> + uint8x16_t k = (uint8x16_t)rk->v;
> + uint8x16_t z = { };
> +
> + if (be) {
> + t = aes_accel_bswap(t);
> + k = aes_accel_bswap(k);
> + t = aes_accel_aesd(t, z);
> + t = aes_accel_aesimc(t);
> + t = veorq_u8(t, k);
> + t = aes_accel_bswap(t);
> + } else {
> + t = aes_accel_aesd(t, z);
> + t = aes_accel_aesimc(t);
> + t = veorq_u8(t, k);
> + }
> + ret->v = (AESStateVec)t;
> +}
> +
> +#endif
> diff --git a/host/include/aarch64/host/cpuinfo.h
> b/host/include/aarch64/host/cpuinfo.h
> index 82227890b4..05feeb4f43 100644
> --- a/host/include/aarch64/host/cpuinfo.h
> +++ b/host/include/aarch64/host/cpuinfo.h
> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
> #define CPUINFO_ALWAYS (1u << 0) /* so cpuinfo is nonzero */
> #define CPUINFO_LSE (1u << 1)
> #define CPUINFO_LSE2 (1u << 2)
> +#define CPUINFO_AES (1u << 3)
>
> /* Initialized with a constructor. */
> extern unsigned cpuinfo;
> diff --git a/util/cpuinfo-aarch64.c b/util/cpuinfo-aarch64.c
> index f99acb7884..ababc39550 100644
> --- a/util/cpuinfo-aarch64.c
> +++ b/util/cpuinfo-aarch64.c
> @@ -56,10 +56,12 @@ unsigned __attribute__((constructor)) cpuinfo_init(void)
> unsigned long hwcap = qemu_getauxval(AT_HWCAP);
> info |= (hwcap & HWCAP_ATOMICS ? CPUINFO_LSE : 0);
> info |= (hwcap & HWCAP_USCAT ? CPUINFO_LSE2 : 0);
> + info |= (hwcap & HWCAP_AES ? CPUINFO_AES: 0);
> #endif
> #ifdef CONFIG_DARWIN
> info |= sysctl_for_bool("hw.optional.arm.FEAT_LSE") * CPUINFO_LSE;
> info |= sysctl_for_bool("hw.optional.arm.FEAT_LSE2") * CPUINFO_LSE2;
> + info |= sysctl_for_bool("hw.optional.arm.FEAT_AES") * CPUINFO_AES;
> #endif
>
> cpuinfo = info;
> --
> 2.34.1
>
- [PATCH 21/35] crypto: Add aesenc_SB_SR_MC_AK, (continued)
- [PATCH 21/35] crypto: Add aesenc_SB_SR_MC_AK, Richard Henderson, 2023/06/02
- [PATCH 23/35] target/ppc: Use aesenc_SB_SR_MC_AK, Richard Henderson, 2023/06/02
- [PATCH 24/35] target/riscv: Use aesenc_SB_SR_MC_AK, Richard Henderson, 2023/06/02
- [PATCH 26/35] target/i386: Use aesdec_ISB_ISR_IMC_AK, Richard Henderson, 2023/06/02
- [PATCH 25/35] crypto: Add aesdec_ISB_ISR_IMC_AK, Richard Henderson, 2023/06/02
- [PATCH 14/35] target/riscv: Use aesdec_ISB_ISR, Richard Henderson, 2023/06/02
- [PATCH 27/35] target/riscv: Use aesdec_ISB_ISR_IMC_AK, Richard Henderson, 2023/06/02
- [PATCH 30/35] host/include/i386: Implement aes-round.h, Richard Henderson, 2023/06/02
- [PATCH 15/35] crypto: Add aesenc_MC, Richard Henderson, 2023/06/02
- [PATCH 31/35] host/include/aarch64: Implement aes-round.h, Richard Henderson, 2023/06/02
- Re: [PATCH 31/35] host/include/aarch64: Implement aes-round.h,
Ard Biesheuvel <=
- [PATCH 16/35] target/arm: Use aesenc_MC, Richard Henderson, 2023/06/02
- [PATCH 34/35] crypto: Remove AES_imc, Richard Henderson, 2023/06/02
- [PATCH 35/35] crypto: Unexport AES_*_rot, AES_TeN, AES_TdN, Richard Henderson, 2023/06/02
- [PATCH 18/35] target/i386: Use aesdec_IMC, Richard Henderson, 2023/06/02
- [PATCH 20/35] target/riscv: Use aesdec_IMC, Richard Henderson, 2023/06/02
- [PATCH 22/35] target/i386: Use aesenc_SB_SR_MC_AK, Richard Henderson, 2023/06/02
- [PATCH 19/35] target/arm: Use aesdec_IMC, Richard Henderson, 2023/06/02
- [PATCH 29/35] target/ppc: Use aesdec_ISB_ISR_AK_IMC, Richard Henderson, 2023/06/02
- [PATCH 32/35] crypto: Remove AES_shifts, AES_ishifts, Richard Henderson, 2023/06/02