[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 5/9] hw/arm/aspeed_ast10x0: Map the secure SRAM
From: |
Peter Delevoryas |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 5/9] hw/arm/aspeed_ast10x0: Map the secure SRAM |
Date: |
Thu, 29 Dec 2022 12:50:52 -0800 |
On Thu, Dec 29, 2022 at 04:23:21PM +0100, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> Some SRAM appears to be used by the Secure Boot unit and
> crypto accelerators. Name it 'secure sram'.
>
> Note, the SRAM base address was already present but unused
> (the 'SBC' index is used for the MMIO peripheral).
>
> Interestingly using CFLAGS=-Winitializer-overrides reports:
>
> ../hw/arm/aspeed_ast10x0.c:32:30: warning: initializer overrides prior
> initialization of this subobject [-Winitializer-overrides]
> [ASPEED_DEV_SBC] = 0x7E6F2000,
> ^~~~~~~~~~
> ../hw/arm/aspeed_ast10x0.c:24:30: note: previous initialization is here
> [ASPEED_DEV_SBC] = 0x79000000,
> ^~~~~~~~~~
Ohhhh! Oh no, yeah I think Zephyr has this warning enabled by default, right? I
guess it's not enabled in QEMU? Hmmmm.
Reviewed-by: Peter Delevoryas <peter@pjd.dev>
Also maybe include this tag?
Fixes: 356b230ed1 ("aspeed/soc : Add AST1030 support")
> This fixes with Zephyr:
>
> uart:~$ rsa test
> rsa test vector[0]:
> [00:00:26.156,000] <err> os: ***** BUS FAULT *****
> [00:00:26.157,000] <err> os: Precise data bus error
> [00:00:26.157,000] <err> os: BFAR Address: 0x79000000
> [00:00:26.158,000] <err> os: r0/a1: 0x79000000 r1/a2: 0x00000000 r2/a3:
> 0x00001800
> [00:00:26.158,000] <err> os: r3/a4: 0x79001800 r12/ip: 0x00000800 r14/lr:
> 0x0001098d
> [00:00:26.158,000] <err> os: xpsr: 0x81000000
> [00:00:26.158,000] <err> os: Faulting instruction address (r15/pc):
> 0x0001e1bc
> [00:00:26.158,000] <err> os: >>> ZEPHYR FATAL ERROR 0: CPU exception on CPU > 0
> [00:00:26.158,000] <err> os: Current thread: 0x38248 (shell_uart)
> [00:00:26.165,000] <err> os: Halting system
>
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
> ---
> hw/arm/aspeed_ast10x0.c | 11 ++++++++++-
> include/hw/arm/aspeed_soc.h | 3 +++
> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/arm/aspeed_ast10x0.c b/hw/arm/aspeed_ast10x0.c
> index 53ea6d471f..21a2e62345 100644
> --- a/hw/arm/aspeed_ast10x0.c
> +++ b/hw/arm/aspeed_ast10x0.c
> @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@
>
> static const hwaddr aspeed_soc_ast1030_memmap[] = {
> [ASPEED_DEV_SRAM] = 0x00000000,
> - [ASPEED_DEV_SBC] = 0x79000000,
> + [ASPEED_DEV_SECSRAM] = 0x79000000,
> [ASPEED_DEV_IOMEM] = 0x7E600000,
> [ASPEED_DEV_PWM] = 0x7E610000,
> [ASPEED_DEV_FMC] = 0x7E620000,
> @@ -222,6 +222,14 @@ static void aspeed_soc_ast1030_realize(DeviceState
> *dev_soc, Error **errp)
> memory_region_add_subregion(s->memory,
> sc->memmap[ASPEED_DEV_SRAM],
> &s->sram);
> + memory_region_init_ram(&s->secsram, OBJECT(s), "sec.sram",
> + sc->secsram_size, &err);
> + if (err != NULL) {
> + error_propagate(errp, err);
> + return;
> + }
> + memory_region_add_subregion(s->memory, sc->memmap[ASPEED_DEV_SECSRAM],
> + &s->secsram);
>
> /* SCU */
> if (!sysbus_realize(SYS_BUS_DEVICE(&s->scu), errp)) {
> @@ -401,6 +409,7 @@ static void aspeed_soc_ast1030_class_init(ObjectClass
> *klass, void *data)
> sc->cpu_type = ARM_CPU_TYPE_NAME("cortex-m4");
> sc->silicon_rev = AST1030_A1_SILICON_REV;
> sc->sram_size = 768 * KiB;
> + sc->secsram_size = 9 * KiB;
> sc->spis_num = 2;
> sc->ehcis_num = 0;
> sc->wdts_num = 4;
> diff --git a/include/hw/arm/aspeed_soc.h b/include/hw/arm/aspeed_soc.h
> index 9a5e3c0bac..bd1e03e78a 100644
> --- a/include/hw/arm/aspeed_soc.h
> +++ b/include/hw/arm/aspeed_soc.h
> @@ -71,6 +71,7 @@ struct AspeedSoCState {
> AspeedSMCState spi[ASPEED_SPIS_NUM];
> EHCISysBusState ehci[ASPEED_EHCIS_NUM];
> AspeedSBCState sbc;
> + MemoryRegion secsram;
> UnimplementedDeviceState sbc_unimplemented;
> AspeedSDMCState sdmc;
> AspeedWDTState wdt[ASPEED_WDTS_NUM];
> @@ -105,6 +106,7 @@ struct AspeedSoCClass {
> const char *cpu_type;
> uint32_t silicon_rev;
> uint64_t sram_size;
> + uint64_t secsram_size;
> int spis_num;
> int ehcis_num;
> int wdts_num;
> @@ -143,6 +145,7 @@ enum {
> ASPEED_DEV_SCU,
> ASPEED_DEV_ADC,
> ASPEED_DEV_SBC,
> + ASPEED_DEV_SECSRAM,
> ASPEED_DEV_EMMC_BC,
> ASPEED_DEV_VIDEO,
> ASPEED_DEV_SRAM,
> --
> 2.38.1
>
- Re: [PATCH 1/9] hw/watchdog/wdt_aspeed: Map the whole MMIO range, (continued)
- [PATCH 2/9] hw/arm/aspeed: Use the IEC binary prefix definitions, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2022/12/29
- [PATCH 3/9] hw/arm/aspeed_ast10x0: Add various unimplemented peripherals, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2022/12/29
- [PATCH 4/9] hw/arm/aspeed_ast10x0: Map I3C peripheral, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2022/12/29
- [PATCH 5/9] hw/arm/aspeed_ast10x0: Map the secure SRAM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2022/12/29
- Re: [PATCH 5/9] hw/arm/aspeed_ast10x0: Map the secure SRAM,
Peter Delevoryas <=
- [PATCH 6/9] hw/arm/aspeed_ast10x0: Map HACE peripheral, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2022/12/29
- [PATCH 7/9] hw/misc/aspeed_hace: Do not crash if address_space_map() failed, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2022/12/29
- [PATCH 8/9] hw/arm/aspeed_ast10x0: Add TODO comment to use Cortex-M4F, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2022/12/29
- [PATCH 9/9] tests/avocado: Test Aspeed Zephyr SDK v00.01.08 on AST1030 board, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2022/12/29