[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] hw/arm/boot: set initrd parameters to 64bit in fdt
From: |
Peter Maydell |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] hw/arm/boot: set initrd parameters to 64bit in fdt |
Date: |
Tue, 8 Nov 2022 13:54:02 +0000 |
On Tue, 8 Nov 2022 at 12:52, Schspa Shi <schspa@gmail.com> wrote:
> Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org> writes:
> > There is a whole comment in boot.c talking about keeping initrd within
> > lowmem:
> >
> > /*
> > * We want to put the initrd far enough into RAM that when the
> > * kernel is uncompressed it will not clobber the initrd. However
> > * on boards without much RAM we must ensure that we still leave
> > * enough room for a decent sized initrd, and on boards with large
> > * amounts of RAM we must avoid the initrd being so far up in RAM
> > * that it is outside lowmem and inaccessible to the kernel.
> > * So for boards with less than 256MB of RAM we put the initrd
> > * halfway into RAM, and for boards with 256MB of RAM or more we put
> > * the initrd at 128MB.
> > * We also refuse to put the initrd somewhere that will definitely
> > * overlay the kernel we just loaded, though for kernel formats which
> > * don't tell us their exact size (eg self-decompressing 32-bit kernels)
> > * we might still make a bad choice here.
> > */
> >
>
> I think this lowmem does not mean below 4GB. and it is to make sure
> the initrd_start > memblock_start_of_DRAM for Linux address range check.
The wording of this comment pre-dates 64-bit CPU support: it
is talking about the requirement in the 32-bit booting doc
https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/arm/Booting
that says
"If an initramfs is in use then, as with the dtb, it must be placed in
a region of memory where the kernel decompressor will not overwrite it
while also with the region which will be covered by the kernel's
low-memory mapping."
So it does mean "below 4GB", because you can't boot a 32-bit kernel
if you don't put the kernel, initrd, etc below 4GB.
thanks
-- PMM
- [PATCH] hw/arm/boot: set initrd parameters to 64bit in fdt, Schspa Shi, 2022/11/07
- Re: [PATCH] hw/arm/boot: set initrd parameters to 64bit in fdt, Alex Bennée, 2022/11/08
- Re: [PATCH] hw/arm/boot: set initrd parameters to 64bit in fdt, Schspa Shi, 2022/11/08
- Re: [PATCH] hw/arm/boot: set initrd parameters to 64bit in fdt,
Peter Maydell <=
- Re: [PATCH] hw/arm/boot: set initrd parameters to 64bit in fdt, Peter Maydell, 2022/11/08
- Re: [PATCH] hw/arm/boot: set initrd parameters to 64bit in fdt, Schspa Shi, 2022/11/08
- Re: [PATCH] hw/arm/boot: set initrd parameters to 64bit in fdt, Peter Maydell, 2022/11/10
- Re: [PATCH] hw/arm/boot: set initrd parameters to 64bit in fdt, Schspa Shi, 2022/11/16
- Re: [PATCH] hw/arm/boot: set initrd parameters to 64bit in fdt, Peter Maydell, 2022/11/16
- Re: [PATCH] hw/arm/boot: set initrd parameters to 64bit in fdt, Schspa Shi, 2022/11/16
- Re: [PATCH] hw/arm/boot: set initrd parameters to 64bit in fdt, Peter Maydell, 2022/11/22
Re: [PATCH] hw/arm/boot: set initrd parameters to 64bit in fdt, Peter Maydell, 2022/11/28