[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[RFC] aspeed/i2c: multi-master between SoC's
From: |
Peter Delevoryas |
Subject: |
[RFC] aspeed/i2c: multi-master between SoC's |
Date: |
Thu, 14 Jul 2022 20:06:45 -0700 |
Hey Cedric, Klaus, and Corey,
So I realized something about the current state of multi-master i2c:
We can't do transfers between two Aspeed I2C controllers, e.g. AST1030 <->
AST2600. I'm looking into this case in the new fby35 machine (which isn't even
merged yet, just in Cedric's pull request)
This is because the AspeedI2CBusSlave is only designed to receive through
i2c_send_async(). But the AspeedI2CBus master-mode transfers use i2c_send().
So, the AST2600 can't send data to the AST1030. And the AST1030 can't reply to
the AST2600.
(By the way, another small issue: AspeedI2CBusSlave expects the parent of its
parent to be its AspeedI2CBus, but that's not true if multiple SoC's are sharing
an I2CBus. But that's easy to resolve, I'll send a patch for that soon).
I'm wondering how best to resolve the multi-SoC send-async issue, while
retaining the ability to send synchronously to non-SoC slave devices.
I think there's only one way, as far as I can see:
- Force the Aspeed I2C Controller to master the I2C bus before starting a master
transfer. Even for synchronous transfers.
This shouldn't be a big problem, we can still do synchronous transfers, we just
have to wait for the bus to be free before starting the transfer.
- If the I2C slave targets for a master2slave transfer support async_send, then
use async_send. This requires refactoring aspeed_i2c_bus_send into a state
machine to send data asynchronously.
In other words, don't try to do a synchronous transfer to an SoC.
But, of course, we can keep doing synchronous transfers from SoC -> sensor or
sensor -> SoC.
I see the code in aspeed_i2c_bus_send turning into something like this:
diff --git a/hw/i2c/aspeed_i2c.c b/hw/i2c/aspeed_i2c.c
index 42c6d69b82..1ea530a77e 100644
--- a/hw/i2c/aspeed_i2c.c
+++ b/hw/i2c/aspeed_i2c.c
@@ -226,10 +226,17 @@ static int aspeed_i2c_dma_read(AspeedI2CBus *bus, uint8_t
*data)
return 0;
}
-static int aspeed_i2c_bus_send(AspeedI2CBus *bus, uint8_t pool_start)
+typedef enum AsyncResult AsyncResult;
+enum AsyncResult {
+ DONE,
+ YIELD,
+ ERROR,
+};
+
+static AsyncResult aspeed_i2c_bus_send(AspeedI2CBus *bus)
{
AspeedI2CClass *aic = ASPEED_I2C_GET_CLASS(bus->controller);
- int ret = -1;
+ AsyncResult ret = DONE;
int i;
uint32_t reg_cmd = aspeed_i2c_bus_cmd_offset(bus);
uint32_t reg_pool_ctrl = aspeed_i2c_bus_pool_ctrl_offset(bus);
@@ -239,41 +246,49 @@ static int aspeed_i2c_bus_send(AspeedI2CBus *bus, uint8_t
pool_start)
TX_COUNT);
if (SHARED_ARRAY_FIELD_EX32(bus->regs, reg_cmd, TX_BUFF_EN)) {
- for (i = pool_start; i < pool_tx_count; i++) {
+ while (bus->pool_pos < pool_tx_count) {
uint8_t *pool_base = aic->bus_pool_base(bus);
- trace_aspeed_i2c_bus_send("BUF", i + 1, pool_tx_count,
+ trace_aspeed_i2c_bus_send("BUF", bus->pool_pos + 1, pool_tx_count,
pool_base[i]);
- ret = i2c_send(bus->bus, pool_base[i]);
- if (ret) {
+ ret = i2c_send_async(bus->bus, pool_base[bus->pool_pos]);
+ if (ret == ERROR) {
break;
}
+ bus->pool_pos++;
+ if (ret == YIELD) {
+ return YIELD;
+ }
}
SHARED_ARRAY_FIELD_DP32(bus->regs, reg_cmd, TX_BUFF_EN, 0);
} else if (SHARED_ARRAY_FIELD_EX32(bus->regs, reg_cmd, TX_DMA_EN)) {
/* In new mode, clear how many bytes we TXed */
- if (aspeed_i2c_is_new_mode(bus->controller)) {
+ if (aspeed_i2c_is_new_mode(bus->controller) && bus->pool_pos == 0) {
ARRAY_FIELD_DP32(bus->regs, I2CM_DMA_LEN_STS, TX_LEN, 0);
}
while (bus->regs[reg_dma_len]) {
uint8_t data;
aspeed_i2c_dma_read(bus, &data);
- trace_aspeed_i2c_bus_send("DMA", bus->regs[reg_dma_len],
+ trace_aspeed_i2c_bus_send("DMA", bus->regs[bus->pool_pos],
bus->regs[reg_dma_len], data);
- ret = i2c_send(bus->bus, data);
- if (ret) {
+ ret = i2c_send_async(bus->bus, data);
+ if (ret == ERROR) {
break;
}
+ bus->pool_pos++;
/* In new mode, keep track of how many bytes we TXed */
if (aspeed_i2c_is_new_mode(bus->controller)) {
ARRAY_FIELD_DP32(bus->regs, I2CM_DMA_LEN_STS, TX_LEN,
ARRAY_FIELD_EX32(bus->regs, I2CM_DMA_LEN_STS,
TX_LEN) + 1);
}
+ if (ret == YIELD) {
+ return YIELD;
+ }
}
SHARED_ARRAY_FIELD_DP32(bus->regs, reg_cmd, TX_DMA_EN, 0);
} else {
- trace_aspeed_i2c_bus_send("BYTE", pool_start, 1,
+ trace_aspeed_i2c_bus_send("BYTE", 1, 1,
bus->regs[reg_byte_buf]);
ret = i2c_send(bus->bus, bus->regs[reg_byte_buf]);
}
Anyways, curious to get your guys' thoughts on this. Thanks!
Peter
- [RFC] aspeed/i2c: multi-master between SoC's,
Peter Delevoryas <=