[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[PATCH 5/5] target/arm: Correctly implement Feat_DoubleLock
From: |
Peter Maydell |
Subject: |
[PATCH 5/5] target/arm: Correctly implement Feat_DoubleLock |
Date: |
Thu, 30 Jun 2022 20:41:16 +0100 |
The architecture defines the OS DoubleLock as a register which
(similarly to the OS Lock) suppresses debug events for use in CPU
powerdown sequences. This functionality is required in Arm v7 and
v8.0; from v8.2 it becomes optional and in v9 it must not be
implemented.
Currently in QEMU we implement the OSDLR_EL1 register as a NOP. This
is wrong both for the "feature implemented" and the "feature not
implemented" cases: if the feature is implemented then the DLK bit
should read as written and cause suppression of debug exceptions, and
if it is not implemented then the bit must be RAZ/WI.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
---
Is there a nicer way to implement the isar_any feature test ?
What I have here is correct but a bit ad-hoc.
---
target/arm/cpu.h | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
target/arm/debug_helper.c | 17 +++++++++++++++--
2 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target/arm/cpu.h b/target/arm/cpu.h
index c533ad0b64d..069dfe1d308 100644
--- a/target/arm/cpu.h
+++ b/target/arm/cpu.h
@@ -500,6 +500,7 @@ typedef struct CPUArchState {
uint64_t dbgwcr[16]; /* watchpoint control registers */
uint64_t mdscr_el1;
uint64_t oslsr_el1; /* OS Lock Status */
+ uint64_t osdlr_el1; /* OS DoubleLock status */
uint64_t mdcr_el2;
uint64_t mdcr_el3;
/* Stores the architectural value of the counter *the last time it was
@@ -2253,6 +2254,15 @@ FIELD(DBGDIDR, CTX_CMPS, 20, 4)
FIELD(DBGDIDR, BRPS, 24, 4)
FIELD(DBGDIDR, WRPS, 28, 4)
+FIELD(DBGDEVID, PCSAMPLE, 0, 4)
+FIELD(DBGDEVID, WPADDRMASK, 4, 4)
+FIELD(DBGDEVID, BPADDRMASK, 8, 4)
+FIELD(DBGDEVID, VECTORCATCH, 12, 4)
+FIELD(DBGDEVID, VIRTEXTNS, 16, 4)
+FIELD(DBGDEVID, DOUBLELOCK, 20, 4)
+FIELD(DBGDEVID, AUXREGS, 24, 4)
+FIELD(DBGDEVID, CIDMASK, 28, 4)
+
FIELD(MVFR0, SIMDREG, 0, 4)
FIELD(MVFR0, FPSP, 4, 4)
FIELD(MVFR0, FPDP, 8, 4)
@@ -3731,6 +3741,11 @@ static inline bool isar_feature_aa32_debugv8p2(const
ARMISARegisters *id)
return FIELD_EX32(id->id_dfr0, ID_DFR0, COPDBG) >= 8;
}
+static inline bool isar_feature_aa32_doublelock(const ARMISARegisters *id)
+{
+ return FIELD_EX32(id->dbgdevid, DBGDEVID, DOUBLELOCK) > 0;
+}
+
/*
* 64-bit feature tests via id registers.
*/
@@ -4155,6 +4170,11 @@ static inline bool isar_feature_aa64_sme_fa64(const
ARMISARegisters *id)
return FIELD_EX64(id->id_aa64smfr0, ID_AA64SMFR0, FA64);
}
+static inline bool isar_feature_aa64_doublelock(const ARMISARegisters *id)
+{
+ return FIELD_SEX64(id->id_aa64dfr0, ID_AA64DFR0, DOUBLELOCK) >= 0;
+}
+
/*
* Feature tests for "does this exist in either 32-bit or 64-bit?"
*/
@@ -4198,6 +4218,22 @@ static inline bool isar_feature_any_ras(const
ARMISARegisters *id)
return isar_feature_aa64_ras(id) || isar_feature_aa32_ras(id);
}
+static inline bool isar_feature_any_doublelock(const ARMISARegisters *id)
+{
+ /*
+ * We can't just OR together the aa32 and aa64 checks, because
+ * if there is no AArch64 support the aa64 function will default
+ * to returning true for a zero id_aa64dfr0.
+ * We use "is id_aa64pfr0 non-zero" as a proxy for "do we have
+ * the AArch64 ID register values in id", because it's always the
+ * case that ID_AA64PFR0_EL1.EL0 at least will be non-zero.
+ */
+ if (id->id_aa64pfr0) {
+ return isar_feature_aa64_doublelock(id);
+ }
+ return isar_feature_aa32_doublelock(id);
+}
+
/*
* Forward to the above feature tests given an ARMCPU pointer.
*/
diff --git a/target/arm/debug_helper.c b/target/arm/debug_helper.c
index e96a4ffd28d..62bd8f85383 100644
--- a/target/arm/debug_helper.c
+++ b/target/arm/debug_helper.c
@@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ static bool aa32_generate_debug_exceptions(CPUARMState *env)
*/
bool arm_generate_debug_exceptions(CPUARMState *env)
{
- if (env->cp15.oslsr_el1 & 1) {
+ if ((env->cp15.oslsr_el1 & 1) || (env->cp15.osdlr_el1 & 1)) {
return false;
}
if (is_a64(env)) {
@@ -614,6 +614,18 @@ static void oslar_write(CPUARMState *env, const
ARMCPRegInfo *ri,
env->cp15.oslsr_el1 = deposit32(env->cp15.oslsr_el1, 1, 1, oslock);
}
+static void osdlr_write(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri,
+ uint64_t value)
+{
+ /*
+ * Only defined bit is bit 0 (DLK); if Feat_DoubleLock is not
+ * implemented this is RAZ/WI.
+ */
+ if (cpu_isar_feature(any_doublelock, env_archcpu(env))) {
+ env->cp15.osdlr_el1 = value & 1;
+ }
+}
+
static const ARMCPRegInfo debug_cp_reginfo[] = {
/*
* DBGDRAR, DBGDSAR: always RAZ since we don't implement memory mapped
@@ -670,7 +682,8 @@ static const ARMCPRegInfo debug_cp_reginfo[] = {
{ .name = "OSDLR_EL1", .state = ARM_CP_STATE_BOTH,
.cp = 14, .opc0 = 2, .opc1 = 0, .crn = 1, .crm = 3, .opc2 = 4,
.access = PL1_RW, .accessfn = access_tdosa,
- .type = ARM_CP_NOP },
+ .writefn = osdlr_write,
+ .fieldoffset = offsetof(CPUARMState, cp15.osdlr_el1) },
/*
* Dummy DBGVCR: Linux wants to clear this on startup, but we don't
* implement vector catch debug events yet.
--
2.25.1
- [PATCH 0/5] target/arm: Implement (or don't) OS Lock and DoubleLock properly, Peter Maydell, 2022/06/30
- [PATCH 3/5] target/arm: Suppress debug exceptions when OS Lock set, Peter Maydell, 2022/06/30
- [PATCH 5/5] target/arm: Correctly implement Feat_DoubleLock,
Peter Maydell <=
- [PATCH 1/5] target/arm: Fix code style issues in debug helper functions, Peter Maydell, 2022/06/30
- [PATCH 4/5] target/arm: Implement AArch32 DBGDEVID, DBGDEVID1, DBGDEVID2, Peter Maydell, 2022/06/30
- [PATCH 2/5] target/arm: Move define_debug_regs() to debug_helper.c, Peter Maydell, 2022/06/30