Re: [PATCH 11/14] aspeed: Switch to create_unimplemented_device_in

[Peter Maydell]

On Thu, 23 Jun 2022 at 13:04, Peter Delevoryas <pdel@fb.com> wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Delevoryas <pdel@fb.com>
> ---
>  hw/arm/aspeed_ast10x0.c | 10 ++++------
>  hw/arm/aspeed_ast2600.c | 19 ++++++++++---------
>  hw/arm/aspeed_soc.c     |  9 +++++----
>  3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/arm/aspeed_ast10x0.c b/hw/arm/aspeed_ast10x0.c
> index d259d30fc0..4e6688cc68 100644
> --- a/hw/arm/aspeed_ast10x0.c
> +++ b/hw/arm/aspeed_ast10x0.c
> @@ -158,12 +158,10 @@ static void aspeed_soc_ast1030_realize(DeviceState 
> *dev_soc, Error **errp)
>      }
>
>      /* General I/O memory space to catch all unimplemented device */
> -    create_unimplemented_device("aspeed.sbc",
> -                                sc->memmap[ASPEED_DEV_SBC],
> -                                0x40000);
> -    create_unimplemented_device("aspeed.io",
> -                                sc->memmap[ASPEED_DEV_IOMEM],
> -                                ASPEED_SOC_IOMEM_SIZE);
> +    create_unimplemented_device_in("aspeed.sbc", sc->memmap[ASPEED_DEV_SBC],
> +                                   0x40000, s->system_memory);
> +    create_unimplemented_device_in("aspeed.io", sc->memmap[ASPEED_DEV_IOMEM],
> +                                   ASPEED_SOC_IOMEM_SIZE, s->system_memory);

This is SoC code, so it should probably be handling its unimplemented
devices by creating and mapping TYPE_UNIMPLEMENTED_DEVICE child
objects directly, the same way it handles all its other child devices.

thanks
-- PMM