qemu-arm
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[PATCH 2/3] hw/acpi/aml-build: Fix {socket, cluster, core} IDs in PPTT


From: Gavin Shan
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] hw/acpi/aml-build: Fix {socket, cluster, core} IDs in PPTT
Date: Wed, 18 May 2022 17:21:40 +0800

The {socket, cluster, core} IDs detected from Linux guest aren't
matching with what have been provided in PPTT. The flag used for
'ACPI Processor ID valid' is missed for {socket, cluster, core}
nodes. In this case, Linux guest takes the offset between the
node and PPTT header as the corresponding IDs, as the following
logs show.

  /home/gavin/sandbox/qemu.main/build/qemu-system-aarch64    \
  -accel kvm -machine virt,gic-version=host -cpu host        \
  -smp 8,sockets=2,clusters=2,cores=2,threads=1
    :

  # cd /sys/devices/system/cpu
  # for i in `seq 0 15`; do cat cpu$i/topology/physical_package_id; done
    36  36  36  36  36  36  36  36
    336 336 336 336 336 336 336 336
  # for i in `seq 0 15`; do cat cpu$i/topology/cluster_id; done
    56  56  56  56  196 196 196 196
    356 356 356 356 496 496 496 496
  # for i in `seq 0 15`; do cat cpu$i/topology/core_id; done
    76  76  136 136 216 216 276 276
    376 376 436 436 516 516 576 576

This fixes the issue by setting 'ACPI Processor ID valid' flag for
{socket, cluster, core} nodes. With this applied, the IDs are exactly
what have been provided in PPTT.

  # for i in `seq 0 15`; do cat cpu$i/topology/physical_package_id; done
  0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
  1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
  # for i in `seq 0 15`; do cat cpu$i/topology/cluster_id; done
  0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1
  0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1
  # for i in `seq 0 15`; do cat cpu$i/topology/core_id; done
  0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1
  0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1

Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
---
 hw/acpi/aml-build.c | 9 ++++++---
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/acpi/aml-build.c b/hw/acpi/aml-build.c
index e6bfac95c7..89f191fd3b 100644
--- a/hw/acpi/aml-build.c
+++ b/hw/acpi/aml-build.c
@@ -2026,7 +2026,8 @@ void build_pptt(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker *linker, 
MachineState *ms,
             core_id = -1;
             socket_offset = table_data->len - pptt_start;
             build_processor_hierarchy_node(table_data,
-                (1 << 0), /* Physical package */
+                (1 << 0) | /* Physical package */
+                (1 << 1),  /* ACPI Processor ID valid */
                 0, socket_id, NULL, 0);
         }
 
@@ -2037,7 +2038,8 @@ void build_pptt(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker *linker, 
MachineState *ms,
                 core_id = -1;
                 cluster_offset = table_data->len - pptt_start;
                 build_processor_hierarchy_node(table_data,
-                    (0 << 0), /* Not a physical package */
+                    (0 << 0) | /* Not a physical package */
+                    (1 << 1),  /* ACPI Processor ID valid */
                     socket_offset, cluster_id, NULL, 0);
             }
         } else {
@@ -2055,7 +2057,8 @@ void build_pptt(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker *linker, 
MachineState *ms,
                 core_id = cpus->cpus[n].props.core_id;
                 core_offset = table_data->len - pptt_start;
                 build_processor_hierarchy_node(table_data,
-                    (0 << 0), /* Not a physical package */
+                    (0 << 0) | /* Not a physical package */
+                    (1 << 1),  /* ACPI Processor ID valid */
                     cluster_offset, core_id, NULL, 0);
             }
 
-- 
2.23.0




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]