Re: [PATCH 2/3] 9pfs: Use g_new() & friends where that makes obvious sense

[Alex Bennée]

Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> writes:

> g_new(T, n) is neater than g_malloc(sizeof(T) * n).  It's also safer,
> for two reasons.  One, it catches multiplication overflowing size_t.
> Two, it returns T * rather than void *, which lets the compiler catch
> more type errors.
>
> This commit only touches allocations with size arguments of the form
> sizeof(T).
>
> Patch created mechanically with:
>
>     $ spatch --in-place --sp-file scripts/coccinelle/use-g_new-etc.cocci \
>            --macro-file scripts/cocci-macro-file.h FILES...
>
> Except this uncovers a typing error:
>
>     ../hw/9pfs/9p.c:855:13: warning: incompatible pointer types assigning to 
> 'QpfEntry *' from 'QppEntry *' [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
>           val = g_new0(QppEntry, 1);
>               ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>     1 warning generated.
>
> Harmless, because QppEntry is larger than QpfEntry.  Fix to allocate a
> QpfEntry instead.
>
> Cc: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
> Cc: Christian Schoenebeck <qemu_oss@crudebyte.com>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>

Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>

-- 
Alex Bennée