[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/5] hw/intc/arm_gicv3: Check for !MEMTX_OK instead of
From: |
Peter Xu |
Subject: |
Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/5] hw/intc/arm_gicv3: Check for !MEMTX_OK instead of MEMTX_ERROR |
Date: |
Mon, 23 Aug 2021 14:46:04 -0400 |
On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 06:41:54PM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> We are going to introduce more MemTxResult bits, so it is
> safer to check for !MEMTX_OK rather than MEMTX_ERROR.
>
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
--
Peter Xu
- [RFC PATCH v2 0/5] physmem: Have flaview API check bus permission from MemTxAttrs argument, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2021/08/23
- [RFC PATCH v2 1/5] softmmu/physmem: Simplify flatview_write and address_space_access_valid, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2021/08/23
- [RFC PATCH v2 2/5] hw/intc/arm_gicv3: Check for !MEMTX_OK instead of MEMTX_ERROR, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2021/08/23
- [RFC PATCH v2 3/5] exec/memattrs: Introduce MemTxAttrs::bus_perm field, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2021/08/23
- [RFC PATCH v2 4/5] softmmu/physmem: Introduce flatview_access_allowed() to check bus perms, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2021/08/23
- [RFC PATCH v2 5/5] softmmu/physmem: Have flaview API check MemTxAttrs::bus_perm field, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2021/08/23