Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Add support for Fujitsu A64FX processor

[Peter Maydell]

On Tue, 3 Aug 2021 at 01:37, ishii.shuuichir@fujitsu.com
<ishii.shuuichir@fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
> > I'm afraid this isn't the way a v2 patchseries should be structured.
> > The idea is that a v2 series should be complete in itself, not based on 
> > whatever v1
> > was. So when you make the changes requested in review of v1, you update the
> > commits in your local git branch, and then you send out the patches as the 
> > v2. v2
> > should apply cleanly on to master, and all the patches in it should be 
> > logically
> > separated out changes (with no "patch 1 makes a change and then patch 2
> > changes the code that was added in patch 1" effects).
>
> Thank you for comments.
> We apologize for the inconvenience caused by our lack of understanding.
> I understood your point.
>
> Just to confirm,
> should I update to v3 and resubmit it as a patch series based on the points 
> you mentioned?

Yes, please.

thanks
-- PMM