On Fri, 18 Jun 2021 at 20:32, Richard Henderson
<richard.henderson@linaro.org> wrote:
Split out a helper function to test for a v2 signal frame.
Cc: qemu-arm@nongnu.org
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
---
linux-user/arm/signal.c | 13 +++++++++----
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/linux-user/arm/signal.c b/linux-user/arm/signal.c
index 32b68ee302..cb65623965 100644
--- a/linux-user/arm/signal.c
+++ b/linux-user/arm/signal.c
@@ -165,6 +165,11 @@ static inline int valid_user_regs(CPUARMState *regs)
return 1;
}
+static bool v2_frame(void)
+{
+ return get_osversion() >= 0x020612;
+}
Not sure how much we care about supporting claiming to be a 15-year-old
kernel any more (especially since we set UNAME_MINIMUM_RELEASE to 2.6.32...)
so it's awfully tempting to just blow away the v1 frame support instead...
Anyway
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>