[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 2/2] docs/system/arm: Add quanta-gbs-bmc reference
From: |
Peter Maydell |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 2/2] docs/system/arm: Add quanta-gbs-bmc reference |
Date: |
Mon, 21 Jun 2021 14:31:36 +0100 |
On Tue, 15 Jun 2021 at 20:29, Patrick Venture <venture@google.com> wrote:
>
> Add line item reference to quanta-gbs-bmc machine.
>
> Signed-off-by: Patrick Venture <venture@google.com>
> ---
> docs/system/arm/nuvoton.rst | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/docs/system/arm/nuvoton.rst b/docs/system/arm/nuvoton.rst
> index ca011bd479..197d149f66 100644
> --- a/docs/system/arm/nuvoton.rst
> +++ b/docs/system/arm/nuvoton.rst
> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> -Nuvoton iBMC boards (``npcm750-evb``, ``quanta-gsj``)
> +Nuvoton iBMC boards (``*-bmc``, ``npcm750-evb``, ``quanta-gsj``)
> =====================================================
>
> The `Nuvoton iBMC`_ chips (NPCM7xx) are a family of ARM-based SoCs that are
> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ segment. The following machines are based on this chip :
> The NPCM730 SoC has two Cortex-A9 cores and is targeted for Data Center and
> Hyperscale applications. The following machines are based on this chip :
>
> +- ``quanta-gbs-bmc`` Quanta GBS server BMC
> - ``quanta-gsj`` Quanta GSJ server BMC
Why aren't we consistent about the names of the machines here?
This suggests that either we should have called the new board
'quanta-gbs', not 'quanta-gbs-bmc', or we should deprecate
'quanta-gsj' and rename it 'quanta-gsj-bmc' ...
thanks
-- PMM