[PATCH v16 46/99] target/arm: fix comments style of fp_exception_el before moving it

[Alex Bennée]

From: Claudio Fontana <cfontana@suse.de>

Signed-off-by: Claudio Fontana <cfontana@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
---
 target/arm/tcg/helper.c | 12 ++++++++----
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target/arm/tcg/helper.c b/target/arm/tcg/helper.c
index 8372089260..d4cafdbd95 100644
--- a/target/arm/tcg/helper.c
+++ b/target/arm/tcg/helper.c
@@ -1625,13 +1625,15 @@ uint32_t HELPER(crc32c)(uint32_t acc, uint32_t val, 
uint32_t bytes)
     return crc32c(acc, buf, bytes) ^ 0xffffffff;
 }
 
-/* Return the exception level to which FP-disabled exceptions should
+/*
+ * Return the exception level to which FP-disabled exceptions should
  * be taken, or 0 if FP is enabled.
  */
 int fp_exception_el(CPUARMState *env, int cur_el)
 {
 #ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
-    /* CPACR and the CPTR registers don't exist before v6, so FP is
+    /*
+     * CPACR and the CPTR registers don't exist before v6, so FP is
      * always accessible
      */
     if (!arm_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_V6)) {
@@ -1654,7 +1656,8 @@ int fp_exception_el(CPUARMState *env, int cur_el)
         return 0;
     }
 
-    /* The CPACR controls traps to EL1, or PL1 if we're 32 bit:
+    /*
+     * The CPACR controls traps to EL1, or PL1 if we're 32 bit:
      * 0, 2 : trap EL0 and EL1/PL1 accesses
      * 1    : trap only EL0 accesses
      * 3    : trap no accesses
@@ -1701,7 +1704,8 @@ int fp_exception_el(CPUARMState *env, int cur_el)
         }
     }
 
-    /* For the CPTR registers we don't need to guard with an ARM_FEATURE
+    /*
+     * For the CPTR registers we don't need to guard with an ARM_FEATURE
      * check because zero bits in the registers mean "don't trap".
      */
 
-- 
2.20.1