[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v2 5/7] hw/arm/smmuv3: Enforce invalidation on a power of two
From: |
Peter Maydell |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v2 5/7] hw/arm/smmuv3: Enforce invalidation on a power of two range |
Date: |
Mon, 8 Mar 2021 16:44:55 +0000 |
On Thu, 25 Feb 2021 at 09:15, Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> As of today, the driver can invalide a number of pages that is
"invalidate"
> not a power of 2. However IOTLB unmap notifications and internal
> IOTLB invalidations work with masks leading to erroneous
> invalidations.
>
> In case the range is not a power of 2, split invalidations into
> power of 2 invalidations.
>
> When looking for a single page entry in the vSMMU internal IOTLB,
> let's make sure that if the entry is not found using a
> g_hash_table_remove() we iterate over all the entries to find a
> potential range that overlaps it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
> ---
> hw/arm/smmu-common.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++------------
> hw/arm/smmuv3.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++----
> 2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/arm/smmu-common.c b/hw/arm/smmu-common.c
> index e9ca3aebb2..84d2c62c26 100644
> --- a/hw/arm/smmu-common.c
> +++ b/hw/arm/smmu-common.c
> @@ -151,22 +151,28 @@ inline void
> smmu_iotlb_inv_iova(SMMUState *s, int asid, dma_addr_t iova,
> uint8_t tg, uint64_t num_pages, uint8_t ttl)
> {
> + /* if tg is not set we use 4KB range invalidation */
> + uint8_t granule = tg ? tg * 2 + 10 : 12;
I see this in-passing side-steps the question about how
we should be handling the lookup-by-key when the tg isn't set.
> +
> if (ttl && (num_pages == 1) && (asid >= 0)) {
> SMMUIOTLBKey key = smmu_get_iotlb_key(asid, iova, tg, ttl);
>
> - g_hash_table_remove(s->iotlb, &key);
> - } else {
> - /* if tg is not set we use 4KB range invalidation */
> - uint8_t granule = tg ? tg * 2 + 10 : 12;
> -
> - SMMUIOTLBPageInvInfo info = {
> - .asid = asid, .iova = iova,
> - .mask = (num_pages * 1 << granule) - 1};
> -
> - g_hash_table_foreach_remove(s->iotlb,
> - smmu_hash_remove_by_asid_iova,
> - &info);
> + if (g_hash_table_remove(s->iotlb, &key)) {
> + return;
> + }
> + /*
> + * if the entry is not found, let's see if it does not
> + * belong to a larger IOTLB entry
> + */
> }
> +
> + SMMUIOTLBPageInvInfo info = {
> + .asid = asid, .iova = iova,
> + .mask = (num_pages * 1 << granule) - 1};
> +
> + g_hash_table_foreach_remove(s->iotlb,
> + smmu_hash_remove_by_asid_iova,
> + &info);
> }
>
> inline void smmu_iotlb_inv_asid(SMMUState *s, uint16_t asid)
> diff --git a/hw/arm/smmuv3.c b/hw/arm/smmuv3.c
> index bd1f97000d..fdd6332ce5 100644
> --- a/hw/arm/smmuv3.c
> +++ b/hw/arm/smmuv3.c
> @@ -861,7 +861,8 @@ static void smmuv3_s1_range_inval(SMMUState *s, Cmd *cmd)
> uint16_t vmid = CMD_VMID(cmd);
> bool leaf = CMD_LEAF(cmd);
> uint8_t tg = CMD_TG(cmd);
> - hwaddr num_pages = 1;
> + uint64_t first_page = 0, last_page;
> + uint64_t num_pages = 1;
> int asid = -1;
>
> if (tg) {
> @@ -874,9 +875,24 @@ static void smmuv3_s1_range_inval(SMMUState *s, Cmd *cmd)
> if (type == SMMU_CMD_TLBI_NH_VA) {
> asid = CMD_ASID(cmd);
> }
> - trace_smmuv3_s1_range_inval(vmid, asid, addr, tg, num_pages, ttl, leaf);
> - smmuv3_inv_notifiers_iova(s, asid, addr, tg, num_pages);
> - smmu_iotlb_inv_iova(s, asid, addr, tg, num_pages, ttl);
> +
> + /* Split invalidations into ^2 range invalidations */
> + last_page = num_pages - 1;
> + while (num_pages) {
> + uint8_t granule = tg * 2 + 10;
> + uint64_t mask, count;
> +
> + mask = dma_aligned_pow2_mask(first_page, last_page, 64 - granule);
> + count = mask + 1;
> +
> + trace_smmuv3_s1_range_inval(vmid, asid, addr, tg, count, ttl, leaf);
> + smmuv3_inv_notifiers_iova(s, asid, addr, tg, count);
> + smmu_iotlb_inv_iova(s, asid, addr, tg, count, ttl);
> +
> + num_pages -= count;
> + first_page += count;
> + addr += count * BIT_ULL(granule);
> + }
> }
This is probably right but I'll wait to review it until I read
the doc comment for dma_aligned_pow2_mask().
-- PMM
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: [PATCH v2 5/7] hw/arm/smmuv3: Enforce invalidation on a power of two range,
Peter Maydell <=