[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 08/14] target/arm: add MMU stage 1 for Secure EL2
|
From: |
Richard Henderson |
|
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 08/14] target/arm: add MMU stage 1 for Secure EL2 |
|
Date: |
Tue, 3 Nov 2020 11:41:21 -0800 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 |
On 11/3/20 10:49 AM, Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote:
> It could also be argued that E2 and E20_2 should be one and the same. The
> regimes are distinct but they cannot coexist. The mode's TLB mode could be
> flushed when HCR.E2H is flipped, I guess.
I don't think so, as there are other implications. E.g. regime_has_2_ranges.
If we merged these two, then we would have to differentiate them in some other
way.
r~