qemu-arm
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v5 10/11] hw/arm: Wire up BMC boot flash for npcm750-evb and


From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 10/11] hw/arm: Wire up BMC boot flash for npcm750-evb and quanta-gsj
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2020 09:48:59 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0

+Thomas

On 7/16/20 10:56 PM, Havard Skinnemoen wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 1:54 PM Havard Skinnemoen
> <hskinnemoen@google.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 3:57 AM Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org> 
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 7/15/20 11:00 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>>>> Now my point.  Why first make up user configuration, then use that to
>>>> create a BlockBackend, when you could just go ahead and create the
>>>> BlockBackend?
>>>
>>> CLI issue mostly.
>>>
>>> We can solve it similarly to the recent "sdcard: Do not allow invalid SD
>>> card sizes" patch:
>>>
>>>  if (!dinfo) {
>>>      error_setg(errp, "Missing SPI flash drive");
>>>      error_append_hint(errp, "You can use a dummy drive using:\n");
>>>      error_append_hint(errp, "-drive if=mtd,driver=null-co,"
>>>                              "read-ones=on,size=64M\n);
>>>      return;
>>>  }
>>>
>>> having npcm7xx_connect_flash() taking an Error* argument,
>>> and MachineClass::init() call it with &error_fatal.
>>
>> Erroring out if the user specifies a configuration that can't possibly
>> boot sounds good to me. Better than trying to come up with defaults
>> that are still not going to result in a bootable system.
>>
>> For testing recovery paths, I think it makes sense to explicitly
>> specify a null device as you suggest.
> 
> Hmm, one problem. qom-test fails with
> 
> qemu-system-aarch64: Missing SPI flash drive
> You can add a dummy drive using:
> -drive if=mtd,driver=null-co,read-zeroes=on,size=32M
> Broken pipe
> /usr/local/google/home/hskinnemoen/qemu/for-upstream/tests/qtest/libqtest.c:166:
> kill_qemu() tried to terminate QEMU process but encountered exit
> status 1 (expected 0)
> ERROR qom-test - too few tests run (expected 68, got 7)
> 
> So it looks like we might need a different solution to this, unless we
> want to make generic tests more machine-aware...
> 



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]