[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] target/arm: Fix using pmu=on on KVM
From: |
Peter Maydell |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] target/arm: Fix using pmu=on on KVM |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Jun 2020 10:19:43 +0100 |
On Tue, 23 Jun 2020 at 10:18, Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 11:06:20AM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> > Since v2:
> > - include Drew test fix (addressed Peter review comments)
> > - addressed Drew review comments
> > - collected R-b/A-b
> >
> > Andrew Jones (1):
> > tests/qtest/arm-cpu-features: Add feature setting tests
> >
> > Philippe Mathieu-Daudé (1):
> > target/arm: Check supported KVM features globally (not per vCPU)
> >
> > target/arm/kvm_arm.h | 21 ++++++++-----------
> > target/arm/cpu.c | 2 +-
> > target/arm/cpu64.c | 10 ++++-----
> > target/arm/kvm.c | 4 ++--
> > target/arm/kvm64.c | 14 +++++--------
> > tests/qtest/arm-cpu-features.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> > 6 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
> >
> > --
> > 2.21.3
> >
> >
>
> Hi Phil,
>
> Thanks for including the test patch. To avoid breaking bisection, if one
> were to use qtest to bisect something, then the order of patches should
> be reversed. I guess Peter can apply them that way without a repost
> though.
Yeah, I can just flip the order.
thanks
-- PMM