qemu-arm
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: kvm_target, QEMU_KVM_ARM_TARGET_GENERIC_V8 questions


From: Peter Maydell
Subject: Re: kvm_target, QEMU_KVM_ARM_TARGET_GENERIC_V8 questions
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2020 13:42:19 +0100

On Mon, 8 Jun 2020 at 13:02, Leif Lindholm <leif@nuviainc.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 04, 2020 at 19:43:06 +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.yaml
> > is the official list of permitted strings, incidentally.
>
> My feeling is none of the values there are appropriate (arm,armv8
> indicates ARM ltd, but not aarch64 support). I made something up for
> the RFC set. We could always send a patch adding some qemu, or
> generic, target.

arm,armv8 is the generic "for software models" target, which
sounds appropriate enough to me. Anything consuming a dtb
presumably already knows whether it's in AArch64 state. If
you needed to be able to determine that from the device tree
then I think you'd be better off defining a property for it
rather than having some kind of lookup table of "these compat
string values imply 64-bit and these others do not".

However, I've just noticed that when the kernel added this to the
CPU binding list (apparently in passing during the conversion
to yaml) in commit 672951cbd1b70a9ede6f9c6eba4ed6b726d32b03
in 2018, it documented "arm,armv8", whereas the string QEMU uses
when KVM is being used is "arm,arm-v8" with a hyphen (or
"arm,arm-v7" for 32-bit KVM), which is what we've used since
2013. So I guess we need to also add the with-a-hyphen version
to the kernel binding documentation.

thanks
-- PMM



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]