[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[RFC 0/6] TPM-TIS bios-tables-test
From: |
Eric Auger |
Subject: |
[RFC 0/6] TPM-TIS bios-tables-test |
Date: |
Mon, 1 Jun 2020 12:21:07 +0200 |
This series adds the test of the TPM2 and DSDT tables when the
TPM-TIS device gets instantiated.
The series also allows to validate changes in the TPM2 table
generation done in "[PATCH v3 0/4] vTPM/aarch64 ACPI support",
sent separately.
This depends on Stefan's "acpi: tpm: Do not build TCPA table
for TPM 2".
This is in RFC state because I am not very familiar with the
table generation process docommented in bios-tables-test.c.
I don't know how to get rid of the checkpatch errors:
"ERROR: Does not appear to be a unified-diff format patch"
Surprisingly, checkpatch argues when void tables are added in
the same time as bios-tables-test-allowed-diff.h changes.
Most importantly, to be able to reuse tpm-emu code, I was forced
to remove the TPM2_ST_NO_SESSIONS assert. I would be grateful
if I could get some advises on the best way to address the issue.
Best Regards
Eric
This series can be found at:
https://github.com/eauger/qemu/tree/v5.0-tpm-acpi-tests-v1
Eric Auger (6):
test/tpm-emu: include sockets and channel headers in tpm-emu header
tests/acpi: Add void tables for Q35/TPM-TIS bios-tables-test
tests/acpi: Ignore TPM2.tis and DSDT.tis
tests: tpm-emu: Remove assert on TPM2_ST_NO_SESSIONS
bios-tables-test: Add Q35/TPM-TIS test
bios-tables-test: Generate reference tables for Q35/TPM-TIS
tests/qtest/tpm-emu.h | 3 ++
tests/qtest/bios-tables-test.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
tests/qtest/tpm-emu.c | 1 -
tests/data/acpi/q35/DSDT.tis | Bin 0 -> 8468 bytes
tests/data/acpi/q35/TPM2.tis | Bin 0 -> 76 bytes
tests/qtest/Makefile.include | 1 +
6 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
create mode 100644 tests/data/acpi/q35/DSDT.tis
create mode 100644 tests/data/acpi/q35/TPM2.tis
--
2.20.1
- [RFC 0/6] TPM-TIS bios-tables-test,
Eric Auger <=