qemu-arm
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] aspeed: sdmc: Implement AST2600 locking behaviour


From: Cédric Le Goater
Subject: Re: [PATCH] aspeed: sdmc: Implement AST2600 locking behaviour
Date: Wed, 6 May 2020 15:46:09 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0

On 5/5/20 11:01 AM, Joel Stanley wrote:
> The AST2600 handles this differently with the extra 'hardlock' state, so
> move the testing to the soc specific class' write callback.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley <address@hidden>

Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <address@hidden>

> ---
>  hw/misc/aspeed_sdmc.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/misc/aspeed_sdmc.c b/hw/misc/aspeed_sdmc.c
> index 02940e7c2a76..7c688becf8c7 100644
> --- a/hw/misc/aspeed_sdmc.c
> +++ b/hw/misc/aspeed_sdmc.c
> @@ -23,7 +23,12 @@
>  
>  /* Protection Key Register */
>  #define R_PROT            (0x00 / 4)
> +#define   PROT_UNLOCKED      0x01
> +#define   PROT_HARDLOCKED    0x10  /* AST2600 */
> +#define   PROT_SOFTLOCKED    0x00
> +
>  #define   PROT_KEY_UNLOCK     0xFC600309
> +#define   PROT_KEY_HARDLOCK   0xDEADDEAD /* AST2600 */
>  
>  /* Configuration Register */
>  #define R_CONF            (0x04 / 4)
> @@ -130,16 +135,6 @@ static void aspeed_sdmc_write(void *opaque, hwaddr addr, 
> uint64_t data,
>          return;
>      }
>  
> -    if (addr == R_PROT) {
> -        s->regs[addr] = (data == PROT_KEY_UNLOCK) ? 1 : 0;
> -        return;
> -    }
> -
> -    if (!s->regs[R_PROT]) {
> -        qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR, "%s: SDMC is locked!\n", __func__);
> -        return;
> -    }
> -
>      asc->write(s, addr, data);
>  }
>  
> @@ -291,6 +286,16 @@ static uint32_t 
> aspeed_2400_sdmc_compute_conf(AspeedSDMCState *s, uint32_t data)
>  static void aspeed_2400_sdmc_write(AspeedSDMCState *s, uint32_t reg,
>                                     uint32_t data)
>  {
> +    if (reg == R_PROT) {
> +        s->regs[reg] = (data == PROT_KEY_UNLOCK) ? PROT_UNLOCKED : 
> PROT_SOFTLOCKED;
> +        return;
> +    }
> +
> +    if (!s->regs[R_PROT]) {
> +        qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR, "%s: SDMC is locked!\n", __func__);
> +        return;
> +    }
> +
>      switch (reg) {
>      case R_CONF:
>          data = aspeed_2400_sdmc_compute_conf(s, data);
> @@ -339,6 +344,16 @@ static uint32_t 
> aspeed_2500_sdmc_compute_conf(AspeedSDMCState *s, uint32_t data)
>  static void aspeed_2500_sdmc_write(AspeedSDMCState *s, uint32_t reg,
>                                     uint32_t data)
>  {
> +    if (reg == R_PROT) {
> +        s->regs[reg] = (data == PROT_KEY_UNLOCK) ? PROT_UNLOCKED : 
> PROT_SOFTLOCKED;
> +        return;
> +    }
> +
> +    if (!s->regs[R_PROT]) {
> +        qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR, "%s: SDMC is locked!\n", __func__);
> +        return;
> +    }
> +
>      switch (reg) {
>      case R_CONF:
>          data = aspeed_2500_sdmc_compute_conf(s, data);
> @@ -395,7 +410,27 @@ static uint32_t 
> aspeed_2600_sdmc_compute_conf(AspeedSDMCState *s, uint32_t data)
>  static void aspeed_2600_sdmc_write(AspeedSDMCState *s, uint32_t reg,
>                                     uint32_t data)
>  {
> +    if (s->regs[R_PROT] == PROT_HARDLOCKED) {
> +        qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR, "%s: SDMC is locked until system 
> reset!\n",
> +                __func__);
> +        return;
> +    }
> +
> +    if (reg != R_PROT && s->regs[R_PROT] == PROT_SOFTLOCKED) {
> +        qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR, "%s: SDMC is locked!\n", __func__);
> +        return;
> +    }
> +
>      switch (reg) {
> +    case R_PROT:
> +        if (data == PROT_KEY_UNLOCK)  {
> +            data = PROT_UNLOCKED;
> +        } else if (data == PROT_KEY_HARDLOCK) {
> +            data = PROT_HARDLOCKED;
> +        } else {
> +            data = PROT_SOFTLOCKED;
> +        }
> +        break;
>      case R_CONF:
>          data = aspeed_2600_sdmc_compute_conf(s, data);
>          break;
> 




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]