[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Question about (and problem with) pflash data access
From: |
Paolo Bonzini |
Subject: |
Re: Question about (and problem with) pflash data access |
Date: |
Thu, 13 Feb 2020 10:51:12 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.1.1 |
On 13/02/20 08:40, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>>>
>>> memory-region: system
>>> 0000000000000000-ffffffffffffffff (prio 0, i/o): system
>>> 0000000000000000-0000000001ffffff (prio 0, romd): omap_sx1.flash0-1
>>> 0000000000000000-0000000001ffffff (prio 0, rom): omap_sx1.flash0-0
>> Eh two memory regions with same size and same priority... Is this legal?
>
> I'd say yes if used with memory_region_set_enabled() to make sure only
> one is enabled. Having both enabled is weird and we should print a
> warning.
Yeah, it's undefined which one becomes visible.
Paolo
- Re: Question about (and problem with) pflash data access, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2020/02/12
- Re: Question about (and problem with) pflash data access, Guenter Roeck, 2020/02/12
- Re: Question about (and problem with) pflash data access, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2020/02/12
- Re: Question about (and problem with) pflash data access, Alexey Kardashevskiy, 2020/02/13
- Re: Question about (and problem with) pflash data access,
Paolo Bonzini <=
- Re: Question about (and problem with) pflash data access, Guenter Roeck, 2020/02/13
- Re: Question about (and problem with) pflash data access, Peter Maydell, 2020/02/13
- Re: Question about (and problem with) pflash data access, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2020/02/13
- Re: Question about (and problem with) pflash data access, Guenter Roeck, 2020/02/13