[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v3 08/13] hw/arm/raspi: Make board_rev a field of RaspiMachin
From: |
Igor Mammedov |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v3 08/13] hw/arm/raspi: Make board_rev a field of RaspiMachineClass |
Date: |
Mon, 10 Feb 2020 14:09:18 +0100 |
On Mon, 10 Feb 2020 11:03:40 +0100
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 2/10/20 10:50 AM, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > On Sat, 8 Feb 2020 17:56:40 +0100
> > Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <address@hidden> wrote:
> >
> >> We want to have a common class_init(). The only value that
> >> matters (and changes) is the board revision.
> >> Pass the board_rev as class_data to class_init().
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <address@hidden>
> >> ---
> >> hw/arm/raspi.c | 17 ++++++++++++++---
> >> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/hw/arm/raspi.c b/hw/arm/raspi.c
> >> index 62b8df3c2e..fbfcd29732 100644
> >> --- a/hw/arm/raspi.c
> >> +++ b/hw/arm/raspi.c
> >> @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ typedef struct RaspiMachineClass {
> >> /*< private >*/
> >> MachineClass parent_obj;
> >> /*< public >*/
> >> + uint32_t board_rev;
> >> } RaspiMachineClass;
> >>
> >> #define TYPE_RASPI_MACHINE MACHINE_TYPE_NAME("raspi-common")
> >> @@ -227,9 +228,11 @@ static void setup_boot(MachineState *machine, int
> >> version, size_t ram_size)
> >> arm_load_kernel(ARM_CPU(first_cpu), machine, &binfo);
> >> }
> >>
> >> -static void raspi_init(MachineState *machine, uint32_t board_rev)
> >> +static void raspi_init(MachineState *machine)
> >> {
> >> + RaspiMachineClass *mc = RASPI_MACHINE_GET_CLASS(machine);
> >> RaspiMachineState *s = RASPI_MACHINE(machine);
> >> + uint32_t board_rev = mc->board_rev;
> >> int version = board_version(board_rev);
> >> uint64_t ram_size = board_ram_size(board_rev);
> >> uint32_t vcram_size;
> >> @@ -279,13 +282,16 @@ static void raspi_init(MachineState *machine,
> >> uint32_t board_rev)
> >>
> >> static void raspi2_init(MachineState *machine)
> >> {
> >> - raspi_init(machine, 0xa21041);
> >> + raspi_init(machine);
> >> }
> >>
> >> static void raspi2_machine_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
> >> {
> >> MachineClass *mc = MACHINE_CLASS(oc);
> >> + RaspiMachineClass *rmc = RASPI_MACHINE_CLASS(oc);
> >> + uint32_t board_rev = (uint32_t)(uintptr_t)data;
> >>
> >> + rmc->board_rev = board_rev;
> >
> > instead of doing a bit obscure ".class_data = (void *)0xa21041," and
> > using it here, I'd just do
> >
> > rmc->board_rev = 0xa21041;
> >
> > using value specific for each leaf class
>
> Leaf classes are removed in patch #12 "Use a unique
> raspi_machine_class_init() method", see more uses of .class_data from v2:
> https://www.mail-archive.com/address@hidden/msg677164.html
> https://www.mail-archive.com/address@hidden/msg677166.html
>
> Are you disagreeing with them? Then we should document .class_data as
> deprecated and show example of good code.
we sometimes use .class_data when creating many derived types
(typical example CPU types (x86) ) where it's impractical to code
leaf class_init functions. I'd use .class_data in cases where I
can't get away with explicit .class_init
However in case of machines (even various versioned ones) practice
was to use parent class_init to set common data and leaf class_inits
to set board (version) specific features.
> > with this change
> > Reviewed-by: Igor Mammedov <address@hidden>
> >
> >> mc->desc = "Raspberry Pi 2B";
> >> mc->init = raspi2_init;
> >> mc->block_default_type = IF_SD;
> >> @@ -302,13 +308,16 @@ static void raspi2_machine_class_init(ObjectClass
> >> *oc, void *data)
> >> #ifdef TARGET_AARCH64
> >> static void raspi3_init(MachineState *machine)
> >> {
> >> - raspi_init(machine, 0xa02082);
> >> + raspi_init(machine);
> >> }
> >>
> >> static void raspi3_machine_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
> >> {
> >> MachineClass *mc = MACHINE_CLASS(oc);
> >> + RaspiMachineClass *rmc = RASPI_MACHINE_CLASS(oc);
> >> + uint32_t board_rev = (uint32_t)(uintptr_t)data;
> >>
> >> + rmc->board_rev = board_rev;
> >> mc->desc = "Raspberry Pi 3B";
> >> mc->init = raspi3_init;
> >> mc->block_default_type = IF_SD;
> >> @@ -327,11 +336,13 @@ static const TypeInfo raspi_machine_types[] = {
> >> .name = MACHINE_TYPE_NAME("raspi2"),
> >> .parent = TYPE_RASPI_MACHINE,
> >> .class_init = raspi2_machine_class_init,
> >> + .class_data = (void *)0xa21041,
> >> #ifdef TARGET_AARCH64
> >> }, {
> >> .name = MACHINE_TYPE_NAME("raspi3"),
> >> .parent = TYPE_RASPI_MACHINE,
> >> .class_init = raspi3_machine_class_init,
> >> + .class_data = (void *)0xa02082,
> >> #endif
> >> }, {
> >> .name = TYPE_RASPI_MACHINE,
> >
>
- [PATCH v3 03/13] hw/arm/raspi: Extract the version from the board revision, (continued)
- [PATCH v3 03/13] hw/arm/raspi: Extract the version from the board revision, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2020/02/08
- [PATCH v3 04/13] hw/arm/raspi: Extract the RAM size from the board revision, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2020/02/08
- [PATCH v3 05/13] hw/arm/raspi: Extract the processor type from the board revision, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2020/02/08
- [PATCH v3 06/13] hw/arm/raspi: Trivial code movement, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2020/02/08
- [PATCH v3 08/13] hw/arm/raspi: Make board_rev a field of RaspiMachineClass, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2020/02/08
- [PATCH v3 07/13] hw/arm/raspi: Make machines children of abstract RaspiMachineClass, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2020/02/08
- [PATCH v3 09/13] hw/arm/raspi: Let class_init() directly call raspi_machine_init(), Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2020/02/08
- [PATCH v3 10/13] hw/arm/raspi: Set default RAM size to size encoded in board revision, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2020/02/08
- [PATCH v3 11/13] hw/arm/raspi: Extract the board model from the board revision, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2020/02/08
- [PATCH v3 13/13] hw/arm/raspi: Extract the cores count from the board revision, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2020/02/08
- [PATCH v3 12/13] hw/arm/raspi: Use a unique raspi_machine_class_init() method, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2020/02/08