[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-arm] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH-for-4.2 v10 10/11] tests: add dummy A
From: |
Peter Maydell |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-arm] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH-for-4.2 v10 10/11] tests: add dummy ACPI tables for arm/virt board |
Date: |
Tue, 17 Sep 2019 16:23:49 +0100 |
On Tue, 17 Sep 2019 at 16:11, Michael S. Tsirkin <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 09:55:34AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 03:50:15PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > > On Wed, 11 Sep 2019 13:57:06 +0100
> > > Peter Maydell <address@hidden> wrote:
> > > > Do the tests pass with this patch and without the
> > > > patch that adds the tests? (That is, can we keep the
> > > > two patches separate without breaking bisection, or
> > > > do we need to squash them together?)
> > > >
> > > > I'll leave it to somebody who understands the ACPI
> > > > tests stuff to answer whether there's a better way to
> > > I'd squash this patch into 11/11 test case,
> >
> >
> > Pls don't - the way to add this is to add the files in question to
> > tests/bios-tables-test-allowed-diff.h.
> >
> > Maintainer will create a separate commit updating
> > the binaries and removing them from the whitelist.
Who is "maintainer" in this part of the process? Why
can't the submitter just create the patches and send them?
> > This way things like rebase work seemlessly.
>
>
> OK?
>
> Can you post v11 like this? I'll ack then.
thanks
-- PMM
- [Qemu-arm] [PATCH-for-4.2 v10 08/11] hw/arm: Use GED for system_powerdown event, (continued)
[Qemu-arm] [PATCH-for-4.2 v10 11/11] tests: Add bios tests to arm/virt, Shameer Kolothum, 2019/09/04