[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-arm] [PATCH] hw/arm/boot: fix direct kernel boot setup
From: |
Peter Maydell |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-arm] [PATCH] hw/arm/boot: fix direct kernel boot setup |
Date: |
Tue, 18 Jun 2019 12:02:37 +0100 |
On Tue, 18 Jun 2019 at 09:34, Andrew Jones <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> We need to check ram_end, not ram_size.
>
> Fixes: 852dc64d665f ("hw/arm/boot: Diagnose layouts that put initrd or
> DTB off the end of RAM")
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <address@hidden>
> ---
> hw/arm/boot.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/arm/boot.c b/hw/arm/boot.c
> index b2f93f6beff6..8a280ab3ed49 100644
> --- a/hw/arm/boot.c
> +++ b/hw/arm/boot.c
> @@ -1109,7 +1109,7 @@ static void arm_setup_direct_kernel_boot(ARMCPU *cpu,
> info->initrd_filename);
> exit(1);
> }
> - if (info->initrd_start + initrd_size > info->ram_size) {
> + if (info->initrd_start + initrd_size > ram_end) {
> error_report("could not load initrd '%s': "
> "too big to fit into RAM after the kernel",
> info->initrd_filename);
> --
> 2.20.1
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <address@hidden>
I think I missed this because my test case doesn't have an
initrd -- direct kernel boot works fine if all you're
passing to QEMU is the kernel... I think we could clarify
the commit message a little:
hw/arm/boot: fix direct kernel boot with initrd
Fix the condition used to check whether the initrd fits
into RAM; this meant we were spuriously refusing to do
a direct boot of a kernel in some cases if an initrd
was also passed on the command line.
?
(if you agree I can just fix up the commit message when I apply it.)
thanks
-- PMM