[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-arm] [PATCH v2 03/18] cutils: Add qemu_strdup_hexlify() and qe
From: |
Laszlo Ersek |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-arm] [PATCH v2 03/18] cutils: Add qemu_strdup_hexlify() and qemu_strdup_unhexlify() |
Date: |
Fri, 8 Mar 2019 10:48:07 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 |
Hi Phil,
most important comment at the bottom.
On 03/08/19 02:32, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> Add two helpers: one to represent a binary data as a string of
> hexadecimal values, and one to restore a such string into its
> original binary data.
>
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <address@hidden>
> ---
> include/qemu/cutils.h | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> util/cutils.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 88 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/qemu/cutils.h b/include/qemu/cutils.h
> index d2dad3057c..375a5508b0 100644
> --- a/include/qemu/cutils.h
> +++ b/include/qemu/cutils.h
> @@ -171,6 +171,39 @@ bool test_buffer_is_zero_next_accel(void);
> int uleb128_encode_small(uint8_t *out, uint32_t n);
> int uleb128_decode_small(const uint8_t *in, uint32_t *n);
>
> +/**
> + * qemu_strdup_hexlify:
(1) I think the name "hexlify" is unusual. I think we should use
encode/decode terminology, or hex/unhex, or, if we want to stick with
the "stringify" pattern, hexify/unhexify. (No "l".)
> + *
> + * Encode a sequence of binary data into its hexadecimal stringified
> + * representation.
> + *
> + * @ptr: Buffer to hexlify
> + * @size: Length of the buffer
> + *
> + * Use qemu_strdup_unhexlify() to convert the hex string to original data.
> + *
> + * Returns: A newly allocated, zero-terminated hex encoded string
> representing
> + * the data. The returned string must be freed with g_free().
> + */
> +gchar *qemu_strdup_hexlify(gconstpointer ptr, gsize size);
> +
> +/**
> + * qemu_strdup_unhexlify:
> + *
> + * Decode a sequence of hexadecimal encoded text into binary data.
> + *
> + * @hex_string: String to unhexlify
> + * @out_size: if not NULL: gsize to be written with the data length
> + *
> + * This function is the opposite of qemu_strdup_hexlify().
> + *
> + * Returns: A newly allocated buffer containing the binary data that text
> + * represents. The returned buffer must be freed with g_free().
> + * Note that the returned binary data is not necessarily zero-terminated,
> + * so it should not be used as a character string.
> + */
> +gpointer qemu_strdup_unhexlify(const gchar *hex_string, gsize *out_size);
> +
> /**
> * qemu_pstrcmp0:
> * @str1: a non-NULL pointer to a C string (*str1 can be NULL)
> diff --git a/util/cutils.c b/util/cutils.c
> index e098debdc0..bf324c0d8b 100644
> --- a/util/cutils.c
> +++ b/util/cutils.c
> @@ -779,6 +779,61 @@ int uleb128_decode_small(const uint8_t *in, uint32_t *n)
> }
> }
>
> +static guchar hexval(const gchar v)
> +{
> + switch (v) {
> + case '0' ... '9':
> + return v - '0';
> + case 'A' ... 'F':
> + return v - 'A' + 10;
> + case 'a' ... 'f':
> + return v - 'a' + 10;
> + default:
> + return 0;
> + }
> +}
(2) I don't think that we should silently translate invalid characters
to zero, in any hexadecimal decoder.
> +
> +gchar *qemu_strdup_hexlify(gconstpointer ptr, gsize len)
> +{
> + guchar *data = (guchar *)ptr;
> + gchar *hex_string;
> +
> + if (!ptr || !len) {
> + return g_strdup("");
> + }
> +
> + hex_string = g_malloc(2 * len + 1);
(3) Should check against integer overflow in the g_malloc() argument
(multiplication and addition).
> + for (gsize i = 0; i < len; i++) {
> + g_snprintf(&hex_string[2 * i], 3, "%02x", data[i]);
> + }
> +
> + return hex_string;
> +}
> +
> +gpointer qemu_strdup_unhexlify(const gchar *hex_string, gsize *out_size)
> +{
> + size_t size = 0;
> + guchar *data = NULL;
> +
> + if (hex_string) {
> + size = strlen(hex_string) / 2;
(4) Should likely check that the length of the string is an even integer.
> + if (size) {
> + size_t i;
> +
> + data = g_new(guchar, size + 1);
> + for (i = 0; i < size; i++) {
> + data[i] = hexval(*hex_string++) << 4;
> + data[i] |= hexval(*hex_string++);
> + }
> + data[i] = '\0';
> + }
> + }
> + if (out_size) {
> + *out_size = size;
> + }
> + return data;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * helper to parse debug environment variables
> */
>
(5) Most importantly: I don't think we need this patch.
First, AFAICS, the unhex function is never used in the series, and no
unit test is being added for it. That makes it a bad candidate for
"include/qemu/cutils.h".
Second, while the hex function is used in PATCH v2 13/18
("hw/nvram/fw_cfg: Add QMP 'info fw_cfg' command"), the documentation in
that patch and the logic in the patch are inconsistent. The
documentation -- i.e. both the commit message and the "misc.json" change
-- say that "FirmwareConfigurationItem.data" is unused (not populated).
However, that's exactly what create_qmp_fw_cfg_item() uses the hex
function for.
Third, if we do decide that the QMP command should output the fw_cfg
binary data, then the QMP tradition (to my knowledge) has been to use
base64 encoding. GLib provides helpers for base64:
https://developer.gnome.org/glib/stable/glib-Base64-Encoding.html
and you can see examples of it being used in e.g.
(a) qmp_ringbuf_read() [chardev/char-ringbuf.c] -- the @ringbuf-read
command is defined in "qapi/char.json"
(b) qmp_guest_exec_status() [qga/commands.c] -- the @guest-exec-status
command is defined in "qga/qapi-schema.json".
Thanks
Laszlo