[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-arm] [RFC PATCH 5/6] virt-acpi-build: add PPTT table
From: |
Andrew Jones |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-arm] [RFC PATCH 5/6] virt-acpi-build: add PPTT table |
Date: |
Wed, 11 Jul 2018 14:51:55 +0200 |
User-agent: |
NeoMutt/20180622 |
On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 02:49:22PM +0200, Andrew Jones wrote:
> The ACPI PPTT table supports topology descriptions for ACPI
> guests. Note, while a DT boot Linux guest with a non-flat CPU
> topology will see socket and core IDs being sequential integers
> starting from zero, e.g. with -smp 4,sockets=2,cores=2,threads=1
>
> a DT boot produces
>
> cpu: 0 package_id: 0 core_id: 0
> cpu: 1 package_id: 0 core_id: 1
> cpu: 2 package_id: 1 core_id: 0
> cpu: 3 package_id: 1 core_id: 1
>
> an ACPI boot produces
>
> cpu: 0 package_id: 36 core_id: 0
> cpu: 1 package_id: 36 core_id: 1
> cpu: 2 package_id: 96 core_id: 2
> cpu: 3 package_id: 96 core_id: 3
>
> This is due to several reasons:
>
> 1) DT cpu nodes do not have an equivalent field to what the PPTT
> ACPI Processor ID must be, i.e. something equal to the MADT CPU
> UID or equal to the UID of an ACPI processor container. In both
> ACPI cases those are platform dependant IDs assigned by the
> vendor.
>
> 2) While QEMU is the vendor for a guest, if the topology specifies
> SMT (> 1 thread), then, with ACPI, it is impossible to assign a
> core-id the same value as a package-id, thus it is not possible
> to have package-id=0 and core-id=0. This is because package and
> core containers must be in the same ACPI namespace and therefore
> must have unique UIDs.
>
> 3) ACPI processor containers are not required for PPTT tables to
> be used and, due to the limitations of which IDs are selected
> described above in (2), they are not helpful for QEMU, so we
> don't build them with this patch. In the absence of them, Linux
> assigns its own unique IDs. The maintainers have chosen not to use
> counters from zero, but rather ACPI table offsets, which explains
> why the numbers are so much larger than with DT.
>
> 4) When there is no SMT (threads=1) the core IDs for ACPI boot guests
> match the logical CPU IDs, because these IDs must be equal to the
> MADT CPU UID (as no processor containers are present), and QEMU
> uses the logical CPU ID for these MADT IDs.
>
> Cc: Igor Mammedov <address@hidden>
> Cc: Shannon Zhao <address@hidden>
> Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <address@hidden>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <address@hidden>
> ---
> hw/acpi/aml-build.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c | 5 ++++
> include/hw/acpi/aml-build.h | 2 ++
> 3 files changed, 57 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/hw/acpi/aml-build.c b/hw/acpi/aml-build.c
> index 1e43cd736de9..37e8f5182ae9 100644
> --- a/hw/acpi/aml-build.c
> +++ b/hw/acpi/aml-build.c
> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
> #include "hw/acpi/aml-build.h"
> #include "qemu/bswap.h"
> #include "qemu/bitops.h"
> +#include "sysemu/cpus.h"
> #include "sysemu/numa.h"
>
> static GArray *build_alloc_array(void)
> @@ -1679,6 +1680,55 @@ void build_slit(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker *linker)
> table_data->len - slit_start, 1, NULL, NULL);
> }
>
> +/*
> + * ACPI 6.2 Processor Properties Topology Table (PPTT)
> + */
> +static void build_cpu_hierarchy(GArray *tbl, uint32_t flags,
> + uint32_t parent, uint32_t id)
> +{
> + build_append_byte(tbl, 0); /* Type 0 - processor */
> + build_append_byte(tbl, 20); /* Length, no private resources */
> + build_append_int_noprefix(tbl, 0, 2); /* Reserved */
> + build_append_int_noprefix(tbl, flags, 4);
> + build_append_int_noprefix(tbl, parent, 4);
> + build_append_int_noprefix(tbl, id, 4);
> + build_append_int_noprefix(tbl, 0, 4); /* Num private resources */
> +}
> +
> +void build_pptt(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker *linker, int possible_cpus)
> +{
> + int pptt_start = table_data->len;
> + int uid = 0, cpus = 0, socket;
> +
> + acpi_data_push(table_data, sizeof(AcpiTableHeader));
> +
> + for (socket = 0; cpus < possible_cpus; socket++) {
> + uint32_t socket_offset = table_data->len - pptt_start;
> + int core;
> +
> + build_cpu_hierarchy(table_data, 1, 0, socket);
> +
> + for (core = 0; core < smp_cores; core++) {
> + uint32_t core_offset = table_data->len - pptt_start;
> + int thread;
> +
> + if (smp_threads > 1) {
> + build_cpu_hierarchy(table_data, 0, socket_offset, core);
> + for (thread = 0; thread < smp_threads; thread++) {
> + build_cpu_hierarchy(table_data, 2, core_offset, uid++);
> + }
> + } else {
> + build_cpu_hierarchy(table_data, 2, socket_offset, uid++);
It just occurred to me that the uid++'s above should be something like
uid[i++]'s, where uid[] is an argument to the function instead. Otherwise
this general aml builder function isn't written generally enough.
> + }
> + }
> + cpus += smp_cores * smp_threads;
> + }
> +
> + build_header(linker, table_data,
> + (void *)(table_data->data + pptt_start), "PPTT",
> + table_data->len - pptt_start, 1, NULL, NULL);
> +}
> +
> /* build rev1/rev3/rev5.1 FADT */
> void build_fadt(GArray *tbl, BIOSLinker *linker, const AcpiFadtData *f,
> const char *oem_id, const char *oem_table_id)
> diff --git a/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c b/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c
> index 1d1fc824da6f..aa77e1f018d9 100644
> --- a/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c
> +++ b/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c
> @@ -832,6 +832,11 @@ void virt_acpi_build(VirtMachineState *vms,
> AcpiBuildTables *tables)
> acpi_add_table(table_offsets, tables_blob);
> build_madt(tables_blob, tables->linker, vms);
>
> + if (!vmc->ignore_cpu_topology) {
> + acpi_add_table(table_offsets, tables_blob);
> + build_pptt(tables_blob, tables->linker, possible_cpus(vms));
> + }
> +
> acpi_add_table(table_offsets, tables_blob);
> build_gtdt(tables_blob, tables->linker, vms);
>
> diff --git a/include/hw/acpi/aml-build.h b/include/hw/acpi/aml-build.h
> index 6c36903c0a5d..2b0fde6bd417 100644
> --- a/include/hw/acpi/aml-build.h
> +++ b/include/hw/acpi/aml-build.h
> @@ -414,6 +414,8 @@ void build_srat_memory(AcpiSratMemoryAffinity *numamem,
> uint64_t base,
>
> void build_slit(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker *linker);
>
> +void build_pptt(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker *linker, int possible_cpus);
> +
> void build_fadt(GArray *tbl, BIOSLinker *linker, const AcpiFadtData *f,
> const char *oem_id, const char *oem_table_id);
> #endif
> --
> 2.17.1
>
- [Qemu-arm] [RFC PATCH 0/6] hw/arm/virt: Introduce cpu topology support, Andrew Jones, 2018/07/04
- [Qemu-arm] [RFC PATCH 1/6] hw/arm/virt: Add virt-3.1 machine type, Andrew Jones, 2018/07/04
- [Qemu-arm] [RFC PATCH 3/6] hw/arm/virt: DT: add cpu-map, Andrew Jones, 2018/07/04
- [Qemu-arm] [RFC PATCH 2/6] device_tree: add qemu_fdt_add_path, Andrew Jones, 2018/07/04
- [Qemu-arm] [RFC PATCH 4/6] hw/arm/virt-acpi-build: distinguish possible and present cpus, Andrew Jones, 2018/07/04
- [Qemu-arm] [RFC PATCH 5/6] virt-acpi-build: add PPTT table, Andrew Jones, 2018/07/04
- [Qemu-arm] [RFC PATCH 6/6] hw/arm/virt: cpu topology: don't allow threads, Andrew Jones, 2018/07/04