[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-arm] [Qemu-devel] [RFC 5/6] hw/arm/virt: support kvm_type prop
From: |
Andrew Jones |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-arm] [Qemu-devel] [RFC 5/6] hw/arm/virt: support kvm_type property |
Date: |
Tue, 3 Jul 2018 14:47:09 +0200 |
User-agent: |
NeoMutt/20180622 |
On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 02:31:02PM +0200, Auger Eric wrote:
> Hi Drew,
>
> On 07/03/2018 01:55 PM, Andrew Jones wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 03:07:32PM +0200, Eric Auger wrote:
> >> The kvm-type property currently is used to pass
> >> a user parameter to KVM_CREATE_VM. This matches
> >> the way KVM/ARM expects to pass the max_vm_phys_shift
> >> parameter.
> >>
> >> This patch adds the support or the kvm-type property in
> >> machvirt and also implements the machine class kvm_type()
> >> callback so that it either returns the kvm-type value
> >> provided by the user or returns the max_vm_phys_shift
> >> exposed by KVM.
> >>
> >> for instance, the usespace can use the following option to
> >> instantiate a 42b IPA guest: -machine kvm-type=42
> >
> > 'kvm-type' is a very generic name. It looks like you're creating a KVM
> > VM of type 42 (which I assume is the ultimate KVM VM that answers the
> > meaning to Life, the Universe, and Everything), but it's not obvious
> > how it relates to physical address bits. Why not call this property
> > something like 'min_vm_phys_shift'? Notice the 'min' in the name,
> > because this is where the user is stating what the minimum number of
> > physical address bits required for the VM is. IIUC, if KVM supports
> > more, then it shouldn't be a problem.
>
> Well I agree with you that using kvm-type=42 is not very nice.
>
> On the other hand the current kernel API to pass the VM GPA address size
> is though the KVM_CREATE_VM kvm_type argument.
>
> in accel/kvm/kvm-all.c there is all the infrastructure to fetch the
> generic machine kvm-type machine option and decode it into type, which
> is passed to KVM_CREATE_VM.
>
> "
> kvm_type = qemu_opt_get(qemu_get_machine_opts(), "kvm-type");
> if (mc->kvm_type) {
> type = mc->kvm_type(ms, kvm_type);
> } else if (kvm_type) {
> ret = -EINVAL;
> fprintf(stderr, "Invalid argument kvm-type=%s\n", kvm_type);
> goto err;
> }
>
> do {
> ret = kvm_ioctl(s, KVM_CREATE_VM, type);
> } while (ret == -EINTR);
> "
>
> This infrastructure already is used in hw/ppc/spapr.c
>
> Whould it be better if we would pass something like kvm-type=48bGPA?
> Otherwise I can decode another virt machine option (min_vm_phys_shift)
> in kvm_type callback.
Yes, this is what I'm thinking. I don't believe we have to expose the
details of the KVM API to the user through the QEMU command line. The
details are actually more complicated anyway, as the phys-shift is
only the lower 8-bits of KVM type[*], not the whole value.
Thanks,
drew
[*] Looks like Suzuki's series is missing the Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt
update needed to specify that.
>
> Thanks
>
> Eric
>
>
> >
> > Thanks,
> > drew
> >
>