qemu-arm
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-arm] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 9/9] hw/arm/virt: Add virt-3.0 machin


From: Auger Eric
Subject: Re: [Qemu-arm] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 9/9] hw/arm/virt: Add virt-3.0 machine type
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2018 08:27:46 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0

Hi Laszlo,

On 06/13/2018 11:05 PM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 06/13/18 10:48, Eric Auger wrote:
> 
>> PATCH: merge of ECAM and VCPU extension
>> - Laszlo reviewed the ECAM changes but I dropped his R-b
>>   due to the squash
> 
> Was there any particular reason why the previous patch set (with only
> the ECAM enlargement) couldn't be merged first? To be honest I'm not
> super happy when my R-b is dropped for non-technical reasons; it seems
> like wasted work for both of us.
> 
> Obviously if there's a technical dependency or some other reason why
> committing the ECAM enlargement in separation would be *wrong*, that's
> different. Even in that case, wouldn't it be possible to keep the
> initial virt-3.0 machtype addition as I reviewed it, and then add the
> rest in an incremental patch?

Sorry about that. My fear was about migration. We would have had 2 virt
3.0 machine models not supporting the same features. While bisecting
migration we could have had the source using the high mem ECAM and the
destination not supporting it. So I preferred to avoid this trouble by
merging the 2 features in one patch. However I may have kept your R-b
restricting its scope to the ECAM stuff.

Thanks

Eric
> 
> Thanks,
> Laszlo
> 



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]