qemu-arm
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-arm] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] KVM: GIC: Fix memory leak due to cal


From: Auger Eric
Subject: Re: [Qemu-arm] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] KVM: GIC: Fix memory leak due to calling kvm_init_irq_routing twice
Date: Thu, 31 May 2018 09:54:42 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0

Hi Shannon,

On 05/31/2018 09:16 AM, Shannon Zhao wrote:
> kvm_irqchip_create called by kvm_init will call kvm_init_irq_routing to
> initialize global capability variables. If we call kvm_init_irq_routing in
> GIC realize function, previous allocated memory will leak.
> 
> Fix this by deleting the unnecessary call.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao <address@hidden>
openpic_kvm seems to suffer the same leak. Don't you want to fix it as
well?

Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <address@hidden>

Thanks

Eric
> ---
>  hw/intc/arm_gic_kvm.c   | 1 -
>  hw/intc/arm_gicv3_kvm.c | 1 -
>  2 files changed, 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/intc/arm_gic_kvm.c b/hw/intc/arm_gic_kvm.c
> index 6f467e6..204369d 100644
> --- a/hw/intc/arm_gic_kvm.c
> +++ b/hw/intc/arm_gic_kvm.c
> @@ -572,7 +572,6 @@ static void kvm_arm_gic_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error 
> **errp)
>  
>      if (kvm_has_gsi_routing()) {
>          /* set up irq routing */
> -        kvm_init_irq_routing(kvm_state);
>          for (i = 0; i < s->num_irq - GIC_INTERNAL; ++i) {
>              kvm_irqchip_add_irq_route(kvm_state, i, 0, i);
>          }
> diff --git a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_kvm.c b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_kvm.c
> index 001d82b..aa4c7c5 100644
> --- a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_kvm.c
> +++ b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_kvm.c
> @@ -813,7 +813,6 @@ static void kvm_arm_gicv3_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error 
> **errp)
>  
>      if (kvm_has_gsi_routing()) {
>          /* set up irq routing */
> -        kvm_init_irq_routing(kvm_state);
>          for (i = 0; i < s->num_irq - GIC_INTERNAL; ++i) {
>              kvm_irqchip_add_irq_route(kvm_state, i, 0, i);
>          }
> 



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]