[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-arm] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 01/14] sd: split "sd-internal.h" of "
From: |
Alistair Francis |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-arm] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 01/14] sd: split "sd-internal.h" of "hw/sd/sd.h" |
Date: |
Thu, 14 Dec 2017 11:33:47 -0800 |
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 9:59 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 2:50 PM, Alistair Francis
> <address@hidden> wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 11:58 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
>> <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> Now only SD 'producers' are able to use the "sd-internal.h" API,
>>> while SD 'consumers' are restricted to the "hw/sd/sd.h" 'public' API.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <address@hidden>
>>
>> I don't see what this gets us. Why bother moving this code into an
>> internal header?
>
> This helped me to sort out the QOM design, however it is indeed not necessary.
If it makes development easier that is a good reason. I just don't see
in this series how it helps.
>
> I later use the registerfields API to add a bunch of other registers
> and bitfields, so I prefer to still move the register #defines in
> another internal header, else this API header get pretty unreadable.
Ah, that makes some more sense.
Alistair
> I'll respin this series without this split.
>