[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-arm] [PATCH] pxa2xx: Fix warnings from cgcc
From: |
Peter Maydell |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-arm] [PATCH] pxa2xx: Fix warnings from cgcc |
Date: |
Thu, 24 Mar 2016 16:53:59 +0000 |
On 24 March 2016 at 16:39, Stefan Weil <address@hidden> wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Weil <address@hidden>
> ---
>
> This patch is rather old, but it still can be applied.
> It avoids duplicate definitions for some array indices
> (which are allowed by gcc, but cgcc complains).
>
> hw/arm/pxa2xx_pic.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/arm/pxa2xx_pic.c b/hw/arm/pxa2xx_pic.c
> index 8a39b1c..a8a68e8 100644
> --- a/hw/arm/pxa2xx_pic.c
> +++ b/hw/arm/pxa2xx_pic.c
> @@ -204,7 +204,6 @@ static void pxa2xx_pic_mem_write(void *opaque, hwaddr
> offset,
>
> /* Interrupt Controller Coprocessor Space Register Mapping */
> static const int pxa2xx_cp_reg_map[0x10] = {
> - [0x0 ... 0xf] = -1,
> [0x0] = ICIP,
> [0x1] = ICMR,
> [0x2] = ICLR,
> @@ -216,6 +215,7 @@ static const int pxa2xx_cp_reg_map[0x10] = {
> [0x8] = ICLR2,
> [0x9] = ICFP2,
> [0xa] = ICPR2,
> + [0xb ... 0xf] = -1,
> };
This is more bug-prone than the current code, because now
if we add or remove an entry in the array we have to change
the final line. The point of [ 0x0 ... 0xf ] is to specify
a default value for the array.
We use -Wno-initializer-overrides to silence a clang warning
about this, because we want to be able to use this "set the
default" idiom.
thanks
-- PMM