Re: [Qemu-arm] [PATCH 0/4] virt: provide secure-only RAM and first flash

[Paolo Bonzini]

On 08/03/2016 13:13, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > As far as this QEMU port is concerned, having some flash in secure and
> > some in non-secure is going to be useful regardless, and 64 MB is
> > plenty for both the code and the data. So if users of the Trustzone
> > port (which is disjoint from the KVM port in any case) can tolerate
> > having the code and the variables in the same pflash file, I could
> > simply move the code into the second flash, and we could reserve the
> > first flash for secure (so it sits at physical address 0x0
>
> Uhm, actually, the code is not even in the flash to begin with. So
> having the second bank be non-secure only makes perfect sense imo

Interesting, where is the code?

Paolo