[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: NCDF functions
From: |
Ben Pfaff |
Subject: |
Re: NCDF functions |
Date: |
Sun, 4 May 2014 10:40:54 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 06:43:57PM +0200, John Darrington wrote:
> Perhaps we should reword it to something like "This function is not
> available in this version of PSPP". I am reluctant to use the word
> "supported" like so many proprietary software vendors seem to throw
> around, because in PSPP (as in most proprietary software) absolutely
> *nothing* is "supported" unless one has taken out an explicit support
> contract.
I changed the wording to the one that you suggested.