[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [playogg-discuss] Youtube and Vimeo in html5
From: |
Ted Smith |
Subject: |
Re: [playogg-discuss] Youtube and Vimeo in html5 |
Date: |
Fri, 22 Jan 2010 18:01:39 -0500 |
On Fri, 2010-01-22 at 16:07 -0500, Joshua Gay wrote:
>
> OK, so I guess the expression would be "go home", no?
>
> -Josh
I would hope the expression would be "keep fighting".
To that end, who's doing something to convince these video providers to
use ogg?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- [playogg-discuss] Re: [Advocate Play Ogg] TinyOgg liberates Flash videos!, Daniel Clark, 2010/01/13
- Re: [playogg-discuss] Re: [Advocate Play Ogg] TinyOgg liberates Flash videos!, davide89v, 2010/01/14
- Re: [playogg-discuss] Re: [Advocate Play Ogg] TinyOgg liberates Flash videos!, Daniel Clark, 2010/01/14
- [playogg-discuss] Youtube and Vimeo in html5, davide89v, 2010/01/22
- Re: [playogg-discuss] Youtube and Vimeo in html5, Ted Smith, 2010/01/22
- Re: [playogg-discuss] Youtube and Vimeo in html5, davide89v, 2010/01/22
- Re: [playogg-discuss] Youtube and Vimeo in html5, Joshua Gay, 2010/01/22
- Re: [playogg-discuss] Youtube and Vimeo in html5, Oleg Koptev, 2010/01/22
- Re: [playogg-discuss] Youtube and Vimeo in html5, Joshua Gay, 2010/01/22
- Re: [playogg-discuss] Youtube and Vimeo in html5,
Ted Smith <=
- Re: [playogg-discuss] Youtube and Vimeo in html5, narendra sisodiya, 2010/01/23