Re: SPAM:17: RE: [Phpgroupware-users] Is no one using this under NT/IIS?

[Chris Weiss]

Patrick Walsh (mr_e) (address@hidden) wrote*:
>
>    There's a knowledge base article floating around somewhere on
>Microsoft's site regarding this.  They deny that it is a bug and cite some
>http standard that they are adhering to by forbidding cookie and location
>headers together.  So don't expect them ever to fix it.  Your refresh fix is
>a neat trick.  What are the effects of this?  Is there any reason why we
>shouldn't ban "Location:" headers altogether?  Is it slower?  Do only some
>browsers support it?
>
i think the text based "links" browser, and probably lynx too, don't support the
refresh header