[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Phpgroupware-users] Small bug in developer-tools' translations

From: Marc Lutolf
Subject: RE: [Phpgroupware-users] Small bug in developer-tools' translations
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 10:42:11 +0100


The ] bug is flagged in the code of developer_tools. I had a look and then
stopped as I was unsure whether it was a bug in the module or a PHP issue
that needed a workaround (I suspect the latter). I am unsure of who the dev
for this module is, so for the moment we'll have to live with the problem.

My "solution" has been to scan the code with developer_tools for missing
phrases, translate them with the module, but then download the file rather
than write it. That works without truncating any ] phrases. I then have a
local file I can continue to work on, or I upload it and substitute the one
on the server. In the next go developer_tools reads the uploaded file

I am not aware of any issue involving html tags. You might try <br> instead
of \n.


-----Original Message-----
From: address@hidden
[mailto:address@hidden Behalf Of Michal Samek
Sent: 26 November 2002 10:14
To: address@hidden
Subject: [Phpgroupware-users] Small bug in developer-tools' translations

Hi again,
There is a bug in the dev. tools' transl. module, maybe it's a serie of
several bugs. It's all related to chars like:

* [ ] \ <>

My translations are saved without '\' -> I can't translate properly a
new line char \n

Html tags placed inside phrases are broken too.

When phpgw displays prompts ending with asterisk * they stay
untranslated. Dunno if due to bad scan for phrases, bad behaviour of
dev-tools module or bug in the translating engine (btw is it documented
somewhere? }.

Strings are broken to parts in dev-tools sometimes when they contain
some chars like ']'.

For now I will use just gvim for translating, but I still need to use
dev-tools for scanning for new phrases, because there seem to be a lot
of them in the code now. Or is the tool scanning for something more than
it should? Generally, do you think that it scans good? Everything and
only what it should match?


Michal Samek <address@hidden>

Phpgroupware-users mailing list

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]