[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Pengfork-devel] Work state
From: |
Nicolas Burrus |
Subject: |
Re: [Pengfork-devel] Work state |
Date: |
Sun, 25 Aug 2002 22:29:54 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.4.3 |
On Saturday 24 August 2002 16:38, Jean-Charles Salzeber wrote:
> For people whishing to know what is the status of my work, you will find
> an archive in:
> http://www.jcs.firstream.net/pengfork-not-a-version.tar.gz
>
>
> It is *NOT* a running version.
> If you want to test, modify the peng.cf file.
> I've some trouble with the tun interface on my Linux box, I've got some
> suscess on OpenBSD, but I think I should concentrate on Linux, isn't it?
>
> The TCP/IP tunneling isn't done, but may not so hard, when I fixed the
> problem.
>
> Just for information are
>
> cat </dev/net/tun
# cat </dev/net/tun
cat: -: File descriptor in bad state
> ifconfig tun0 10.0.0.1 10.0.0.2 up
# ifconfig tun0 10.0.0.1 10.0.0.2 up
SIOCSIFADDR: No such device
tun0: ERROR while getting interface flags: No such device
Just a little remark, prot30_send_packet in prot30.c seems to call
buffer_alloc quite late, and I don't understand why buffer_alloc does not
extend the buffer if necessary.
Will the code be imported in CVS soon ?
--
Nicolas
- [Pengfork-devel] Work state, Jean-Charles Salzeber, 2002/08/24
- Re: [Pengfork-devel] Work state, lordheavy, 2002/08/25
- Re: [Pengfork-devel] Work state,
Nicolas Burrus <=
- Re: [Pengfork-devel] Work state, Jean-Charles Salzeber, 2002/08/25
- Re: [Pengfork-devel] Work state, Nicolas Burrus, 2002/08/25
- Re: [Pengfork-devel] Work state, Jean-Charles Salzeber, 2002/08/26
- Re: [Pengfork-devel] Work state, Nicolas Burrus, 2002/08/26
- Re: [Pengfork-devel] Work state, Jean-Charles Salzeber, 2002/08/26
- Re: [Pengfork-devel] Work state, Nicolas Burrus, 2002/08/26