[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [pdf-devel] Updated unit test for pdf_i64_add
From: |
Jeffrey Walton |
Subject: |
Re: [pdf-devel] Updated unit test for pdf_i64_add |
Date: |
Wed, 24 Feb 2010 06:01:11 -0500 |
Hi Jose,
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 5:49 AM, Jose E. Marchesi <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Unfortunately, I cannot. The mail server is rejecting again.
>>
>> This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
>>
>> A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
>> recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:
>>
>> address@hidden
>>
>> ------ This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. ------
>> ------ The body of the message is 482823 characters long; only the first
>> ------ 106496 or so are included here.
>
> Questions:
>
> 1. Are you using bzr send without -o? Please tell us how do you get the
> merge directive.
Previously I tried bzr send, then tar'd/bz2'd the output. This time I
tried diff:
bzr diff torture/unit/base/types/*.c torture/unit/Makefile.am > tests.diff
> 2. Please send us the full error message that you get from the mail server.
from Mail Delivery System <address@hidden>
to address@hidden
date Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 5:29 AM
subject Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
mailed-by eggs.gnu.org
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:
address@hidden
------ This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. ------
------ The body of the message is 482823 characters long; only the first
------ 106496 or so are included here.
Return-path: <address@hidden>
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69)
(envelope-from <address@hidden>)
id 1NkEUJ-0000NO-8o
for address@hidden; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 05:29:21 -0500
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0 (2010-01-18) on eggs.gnu.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,T_DKIM_INVALID,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL autolearn=ham
version=3.3.0
Received: from mail-bw0-f219.google.com ([209.85.218.219]:48143)
by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
(envelope-from <address@hidden>)
id 1NkEUH-0000NG-AT
for address@hidden; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 05:29:03 -0500
Received: by bwz19 with SMTP id 19so3547201bwz.26
for <address@hidden>; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 02:29:00 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:reply-to:date:message-id
:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=C0oEFL3a440riElEXlIJkWaN/9GXM0unVt4/6VokA6I=;
b=NXoibBQT/xAkgC1+LHmmiw6bN+gkufhAz0t57VJOWazstckbIK8d0Gavhl0cs9FBU9
sMyaWv4p1WW0Pn3hLNc1Qe7niT/F0yERVPUCGmoIDI0BN4KPGa0pIk12BQq5sq8K/8uR
H7lAFQ+c6YzT2V5BBtEUGlAi/jHJb43HODjoA=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=mime-version:reply-to:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
b=MzOyInDKf4XwY9eUR0CxwFWVdbnU2ZbC7XWIhV05BDmeRe7Z6yKW+UImm2dtY79tJj
zT682/tvHo+rVCjjoDqNOSwFJjjwjIrLJACgz7eJPpAn67EEtULh0gfMpM4yYcDJduC2
NrGk/PlKaYZW1oEenhlVbqOfGmmyPFBw3jSwI=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.204.175.68 with SMTP id w4mr1464762bkz.213.1267007339900; Wed,
24 Feb 2010 02:28:59 -0800 (PST)
Reply-To: address@hidden
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 05:28:59 -0500
Message-ID: <address@hidden>
Subject: Tests diff
From: Jeffrey Walton <address@hidden>
To: address@hidden
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=00032555a1726c3455048056226d
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2)
--00032555a1726c3455048056226d
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Hi All,
diff file of submitted tests and changes.
Jeff
--00032555a1726c3455048056226d
Content-Type: text/x-patch; charset=US-ASCII; name="tests.diff"
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="tests.diff"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
X-Attachment-Id: f_g61ze6f20
...
- [pdf-devel] Updated unit test for pdf_i64_add, Jeffrey Walton, 2010/02/24
- Re: [pdf-devel] Updated unit test for pdf_i64_add, Aleksander Morgado, 2010/02/24
- Re: [pdf-devel] Updated unit test for pdf_i64_add, Jeffrey Walton, 2010/02/24
- Re: [pdf-devel] Updated unit test for pdf_i64_add, Jose E. Marchesi, 2010/02/24
- Re: [pdf-devel] Updated unit test for pdf_i64_add,
Jeffrey Walton <=
- Re: [pdf-devel] Updated unit test for pdf_i64_add, Jose E. Marchesi, 2010/02/24
- Re: [pdf-devel] Updated unit test for pdf_i64_add, Jeffrey Walton, 2010/02/24
- Re: [pdf-devel] Updated unit test for pdf_i64_add, Aleksander Morgado, 2010/02/28