AW: [Partysip-dev] X-Ten Client bypasses partysip

[Walter Schober]

Hello!

Well, found it. There are more places of record-route :-) One is in the
filter module, the other below. Just had the one in the filter-module
set to on.

Now changed the others to on as well and X-Ten replies correctly to
partysip! Who wants to report this to X-Ten :-)

Thanks for your help!
Walter

P.S.: But here as well I get the 481 after a CANCEL of that call then,
although I get a RINGING here -> other thread.

On Mon, 15 Sep 2003, Walter Schober wrote:

> Hi!
>
[...]
>
> 1) PartySIP is configured with record-route on, but I miss the 
> Record-Route Field in the outgoing message. Shouldn't be there a
> Record-Route: <sip:192.168.3.2:5060;lr>
> behind the other?

This might comes from a bad configuration file? I don't have enough info
to tell you. send the whole partysip log and partysip.conf to
address@hidden (mailing list won't support attachement)

But the answer should be routed thanks to the Via header. Record-route
are not used for responses. So a bug surely exist in the UA that receive
the call.